Tag: consolidation

  • Legislation for protection against earthquakes

    Legislation for protection against earthquakes


    During the government meeting on Wednesday, Romanias Prime Minister Nicolae Ciucă said that Romania is a country with a high seismic risk, adding that the procedures under which certain construction companies can get certified in various fields of activity must be soon implemented. Furthermore, the Prime Minister says that certain regulations must be adopted forcing construction companies to assume responsibility regarding the earthquake-resistant structure of a building.


    The Prime Minister gave assurances that the government would carry on its efforts in the field of assessing the seismic risk and the measures to be implemented by the Executive and the local authorities for all the programmes and projects aimed at reinforcing the infrastructure


    In the meantime the Romanian Ministry of Development is already running the National Programme for the Consolidation of the Buildings with High Seismic Risk, which has this year been earmarked 40 million Euros worth of budgetary credits and 100 million Euros in commitment appropriation with a 100% funding.


    That means that neither the owners of the aforementioned buildings, nor the local authorities will have to reimburse the money used for their consolidation. According to official data, applications for the structural reinforcement of 400 such buildings have been registered since the beginning of the year. According to Development Minister Cseke Atilla, the first 50 projects have already been selected for funding within the National Programme for the Consolidation of the Buildings with High Seismic Risk.


    Education institutions, social-cultural buildings, blocks of flats, administrative buildings and healthcare units all over Romania have been included on the list of those eligible for funding. The sum for their structural reinforcement accounts for 148 million Euros. Furthermore, on Wednesday the government decided to submit for Parliament approval a bill aimed at banning the rent of apartments in blocks of flats included in vulnerable buildings. The ban will be lifted only after the reinforcement construction has ended.


    According to the Development Minister, after the aforementioned law has come into effect the rent contracts are to be terminated within 30 days at the most.


    Also on Wednesday, the Executive in Bucharest endorsed an emergency ordinance on a programme entitled Safe and Healthy Schools, which proposes a simplified procedure for the introduction of vulnerable schools into the aforementioned investment programme. The list is to be drawn up by the Ministry of Education and will be submitted to the Ministry of Regional Development. According to official figures, besides the buildings to be reinforced through the National Consolidation Programme, the Ministry is funding the reinforcement of another 251 buildings through the National Plan of Recovery and Resilience (PNRR) and of another 57 buildings through the National Investment Company.


    (bill)


  • How would Bucharest look like in the case of a major earthquake?

    How would Bucharest look like in the case of a major earthquake?


    A 7.4-degree earthquake on the Richer scale occurred
    in eastern Romania’s Vrancea seismic area on March 4, 1977, at 21:21 hrs local
    time, at a depth of 94 kilometres. The seismic movement was strongly felt
    across the country, mainly in the south and east. The tremor was also felt in neighbouring
    countries, Serbia, Bulgaria and Hungary, but also in other countries in central and
    southern Europe, as well as Russia, in an area north of Sankt Petersburg.


    In the ’77 quake, just
    as Romanians label it when they reminisce the catastrophe, from memories or by
    hearsay, of the country’s 40 counties, 23 were seriously hit. The tremor
    claimed the lives of 1,578 people. Over 11, 300 people were injured, of whom
    1,424 eventually lost their lives, that is 90% of the total number of the
    deceased. Almost 7,600 people were injured in Bucharest alone! Back then, icons
    of Romanian cultural and artistic life were among the dead: actor Toma Caragiu,
    television director Alexandru Bocăneț, vocalist Doina Badea, literary historian
    Mihai Gafița and prose writer Alexandru Ivasiuc.


    In Romania’s capital city, most
    of the deaths occurred in the wake of the total or partial collapse of more
    than 30 buildings, medium or high-level block of flats, some of them iconic for
    the city’s architecture. Also, a hotel and a wing of the Chemistry Faculty
    collapsed, as well as the Transport Ministry’s IT Centre. The Bucharest West thermal
    power plant was a whisker away from exploding, because a ceiling collapsed and a
    fire broke out. Many other buildings in Bucharest were severely or moderately
    hit.


    The devastating earthquakes that
    hit Turkey and Syria in early February and their dismal aftermath, but also the
    tremor that hit Romania in early March 1977 prompted the Romanians to reach the
    worrying conclusion that no lesson has been learned as regards the impending
    necessity to consolidate the buildings assessed according to various degrees of
    seismic risk!


    Here is architect Ştefan Dumitraşcu, speaking about the present-day situation in Bucharest.


    When I held
    the position of chief architect at the Municipality, for two and a half years,
    these buildings were identified and more than 180 of them had been going through
    a technical expertise so that solution could be found, for their safeguarding
    or consolidation. Moreover, two and a half years ago, through the Municipal Administration
    of the Seismic Risk Consolidation Works Administration, as part of the General
    Council in Bucharest municipal city there were 81 construction sites, especially
    created for such works. Unfortunately, because of changes in administration and
    because of a different mindset, as we speak, we have zero consolidation
    building sites.


    Mostly in the capital city’s
    central area, a great number of old constructions, built before 1977, are very
    fragile, because decades have passed and no renovation works have carried
    whatsoever, let alone anti-seismic consolidation. That is why, according to
    Stefan Dumitraşcu, we’re running out of time.


    We are, however,
    in the eleventh hour, maybe in the twelfth hour, if we want to make sense of
    what we must do. A consolidation operation cannot be completed overnight, it is
    a building site that lasts for a year, a year and a half, for a building
    erected in 1940, let’s say, an eight or ten-story building located on the
    Magheru Boulevard or Voctoria Road, two of the capital city’s most significant
    thoroughfares. As I was saying, on one hand, we can educate the people, in a bid
    to find the right alternative solutions for regrouping, helping and intervening,
    in the case of an earthquake. Everybody is unanimous in admitting that a major
    tremor in the Capital city will occur, and it will occur, that’s for sure, and
    it’s out of the question, with us, like, on a fine spring afternoon, going out
    in the park and waiting for the army to show up, carrying products from the
    State reserve and giving us a bottle of water each, and a can of meat. No way!
    Something like that must be very seriously organized and we also need to have a
    competent management at the Municipality, so that consolidation works can be
    resumed as soon as possible.


    The prefect of the Capital
    city, Toni Greblă, also cautioned that it was not the lack of funding that hindered
    the buildings anti-seismic rehabilitation, but


    …The
    carelessness of some of the administration officials who do not have a proper
    preparation of the projects enabling the start of the buildings’ rehabilitation
    and their anti-seismic consolidation. In the last 15 years, no municipal city
    can complain, and at that, especially Bucharest municipal city, that they did
    not have money earmarked for the rehabilitation of buildings. Year after year,
    funds provided by the Development Ministry remain unspent, and that, because we
    are unable to work in order to develop projects for the anti-seismic
    consolidation, and implement them.

    The consolidation of the
    buildings assessed for seismic risk can be fully financed from the budget but
    also through the Recovery and Resilience Plan for Romania, after registration is
    made for a dedicated digital platform. Waiting for their buildings to be
    consolidated, could the Romanians know, at least, what the country’s safest
    cities are, in the case of a strong earthquake? Attempting an answer to the
    question is a seismologist with the National Research-Development Institute for
    Earth Physics, Mihail Diaconescu.


    Of course we
    can know that, but I’m not so sure how sound that would be. What are we going
    to do, migrate to those cities, all of us, and depopulate part of the country? ʺ
    The thing is, construction and consolidation works should be carried, for all
    that has been affected in time. The moment we set about building something, not
    us, as natural persons, but as the State, as construction companies, we need to
    comply with the construction code. If that construction code is complied with, the
    danger does not exist anymore, that of the house crumbling on us.


    So, as we speak, how would
    Bucharest look like, in the case of a major earthquake? Far worse than 46 years
    ago, possibly. According to data provided by the Development Ministry, in
    Romania, there are 2,687 buildings assessed according to various degrees of
    seismic risk. Most of them a rein Bucharest, of which several hundred are 1st
    and 2nd-degree buildings according to their seismic risk potential.


    However, the situation is far
    worse. According to a survey carried by the Bucharest Municipal City’s
    Emergency Situations Committee, should an earthquake happen, having the same
    intensity as that in 1977, in Bucharest, 23,000 buildings could suffer serious
    damage. Of those, 1,000 could collapse, partially or totally. (EN)

  • La consolidation des immeubles à risque sismique en Roumanie

    La consolidation des immeubles à risque sismique en Roumanie

    Les tremblements de terre de la semaine dernière en Turquie et en Syrie devraient entraîner l’accélération des projets de consolidations des bâtiments en Roumanie. De nombreuses tentatives en ce sens ont existé au fil des ans mais sans résultats concrets. Et des milliers de bâtiments historiques des grandes villes roumaines pourraient être endommagés en cas de séisme. C’est notamment le cas de ceux qui n’ont pas fait l’objet d’expertise. Le Gouvernement a l’intention de s’occuper de la consolidation de ces édifices. A le demande du premier ministre Nicolae Ciuca, ce sujet sera à l’ordre du jour de l’agenda gouvernemental cette semaine. En effet la Roumanie compte environ 2700 bâtiments à risque sismique élevé, la majorité à Bucarest.

    Actuellement, deux programmes sont financés afin de veiller à la consolidation des constructions présentant des risques sismiques. Il s’agit du programme mené par le Ministère du développement et de celui qui est intégré au Plan National de Relance et de Résilience (PNRR). Le premier ministre qui a constaté les situations graves auxquelles sont confrontées la Turquie et la Syrie où des dizaines de milliers de personnes ont perdu la vie, a enjoint le ministre du développement de lui présenter les mesures qu’il va prendre en vue d’accélérer la mise en pratique de son programme. Le premier ministre considère que le problème roumain réside dans la mauvaise mise en œuvre des programmes déjà existants. Il a déclaré : « Ici nous retrouvons certains de nos plus grands problèmes. Nous discutons, nous planifions, mais quand vient le moment de la mise en œuvre, des justifications sont trouvées à chaque fois pour ralentir l’ensemble de l’activité. Je pense que c’est pour ça que nous en sommes où nous en sommes aujourd’hui, parce qu’il n’y a pas de cohérence dans l’exécution de toutes les décisions qui ont été prises dans ce sens. » a déclaré le premier ministre Nicolae Ciuca.

    A son tour, le secrétaire d’Etat au ministère du développement, Marin Tole, a précisé que tant les bâtiments résidentiels que les bâtiments publics devaient être consolidés, en particulier les écoles, les maternelles et les hôpitaux. Il a également déclaré qu’il existe un mécanisme de simplification de la manière dont sont identifiés les bâtiments à risque sismique élevé. « Nous avons cherché à ce que tous les bâtiments classés risque sismique 1 ou 2 soient recensés et accessibles afin que l’Etat roumain puisse intervenir et notamment l’Unité administrative territoriale, qui doit veiller à ce que ces constructions soient consolidés grâce aux fonds dédiés du budget national ou aux fonds mis à disposition par la Commission européenne. » a déclaré Marin Tole.

    Le budget du plan national de consolidation du bâtit atteint environ 700 millions de lei soit 142,8 millions d’euros, celui du programme « Vague de rénovation » compris dans le Plan National de Relance et de Résilience s’élève à plus de 500 millions d’euros. Le dernier tremblement de terre important en Roumanie remonte au 4 mars 1977 et avait entraîné la mort de plus de 1500 personnes. Selon les statistiques, Bucarest est la capitale européenne présentant le risque sismique le plus élevé.

  • Strengthening NATO’s eastern flank, a priority

    Strengthening NATO’s eastern flank, a priority

    Consolidating the eastern
    flank of NATO is, in the context of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a priority
    for the members of the organisation. At an informal meeting of the NATO foreign
    ministers in Berlin, the Romanian diplomacy chief Bogdan Aurescu emphasised the
    importance of the long-term consolidation of NATO’s deterrence and defence posture
    on the eastern flank, particularly at the Black Sea, in a balanced and unified
    manner.



    Minister Aurescu said the decision
    made by the Allied leaders at their Summit on 24 March, concerning the set-up
    of 4 new battle groups, one of them in Romania, is an especially useful first
    step in this respect, and thanked the Allied states involved. The talks in
    Berlin concerned NATO’s open door policy, the war in Ukraine and its impact on
    Euro-Atlantic security. Bogdan Aurescu said Romania was in favour of a quick
    accession of Finland and Sweden to the organisation, and pointed out that the 2
    countries’ membership will consolidate the Alliance as a whole, making it
    stronger.


    On the one hand, Romania
    is a firm supporter of the open-door policy, which has many benefits for the entire
    Alliance, and we know, from our own experience, how important it was for
    reforming Romania,ˮ the foreign minister said. At the same time, he added, Bucharest
    feels that the accession of these 2 states will consolidate the Alliance on the
    whole and we believe that, with Finland and Sweden members of the Alliance, the
    deterrence posture will be more efficient and defence more consolidated.ˮ


    Another topic approached
    at the Berlin meeting was the preparation of the decisions to be made at the
    Madrid Summit at the end of June, and during the working session the Romanian
    official pointed out that with these decisions, the Madrid Summit is likely to
    be a fundamental milestone in the history of the Alliance.


    Bogdan Aurescu highlighted that the new strategic concept to be endorsed by NATO
    leaders at the end of June, will define the Alliance’s profile and major lines
    of action for the next decade at least. He also emphasised the importance of this
    strategic document taking into account, in a realistic and adequate manner, the
    new security context facing the organisation, by highlighting the main threats
    and challenges and ensuring an efficient and proportionate response capacity. Minister
    Aurescu also said the new strategic concept should reflect the fact that Russia
    remains the main challenge for the Alliance. (A.M.P.)