Tag: defence shield

  • The Week in Review, May 9-14

    The Week in Review, May 9-14

    A historic moment for Romania


    On Thursday, the Aegis Ashore missile defence facility
    was opened in Deveselu, southern Romania. The event was attended by the NATO Secretary
    General Jens Stoltenberg and the US Deputy Secretary of Defence, Robert Work.
    The shield is aimed at strengthening Euro-Atlantic Security, adding to NATO’s
    other anti-missile defence capabilities, such as the high-performance radar in
    Turkey and a command and control system in Germany. A second such facility is
    due to be built in Poland and will be rendered operational in 2018. The
    facility in Deveselu is designed to respond to potential ballistic threats,
    especially from the Middle East. The shield does not target any country in
    particular, as the Romanian Prime Minister Dacian Ciolos stressed:




    The Deveselu Facility is a means destined exclusively for
    legitimate defence against ballistic missile threats. It strengthens the NATO
    missile defence capabilities and expands the coverage and protection area for
    the Allied countries in Southern and Central Europe, thus significantly
    reducing the risk of potential attacks with ballistic missiles from outside the
    Euro-Atlantic space.




    Moscow sees the anti-missile defence shield as a threat,
    condemning the opening of the Deveselu facility and announcing it would
    strengthen its own military capabilities.




    The disinfectants scandal


    The technocratic Government in Bucharest, which came to
    power some six months ago, is facing a new crisis. Earlier this week, Health
    Minister Patriciu Achimas Cadariu tendered his resignation amidst a new
    large-scale scandal regarding the use of diluted disinfectants in hospitals.
    Prime Minister Dacian Ciolos, who is now the interim Health Minister, said
    healthcare was a priority of his term in office:




    I want to use the next six
    months to take other structural measures which, even if they don’t
    systematically reform the healthcare system, will at least dig up and clarify some of the problems. I
    want to assure everyone that I will not hide anything, and I will not neglect
    anything.




    According to Prime Minister Ciolos, over the last six-seven
    years Romania has had at least 10 Health Ministers, none of whom seemed capable
    of reforming the system, leading to a string of scandals in recent months.




    IMF recommendations for Bucharest


    The executive board of the
    International Monetary Fund has examined the report of its latest assessment
    mission to Romania in March. On Wednesday, the IMF submitted a number of
    recommendations to Bucharest authorities. The Fund argues in favour of
    continuing reforms aimed at redressing the economy and attracting investors.
    The IMF expects an economic growth of over 4% in Romania this year, and of 3.6%
    in 2017. Experts say the economy is on an upward cyclic trend, supported by the
    recent salary increase in the public sector and the VAT slash, which have
    boosted private consumption. In its recommendations submitted to the Government,
    the IMF signals that the current premises for growth cannot be sustained in the
    absence of reforms. IMF experts have recommended the authorities to stop giving
    in to social pressure. At present, Romania has no ongoing agreement with the
    IMF.




    150 years
    since the establishment of Romanian monarchy


    On May 10,
    Romania celebrated King’s Day, which has this year become a national holiday.
    May 10th has a triple significance for Romania. On May 10, 1866,
    Carol I became ruler of Romania. 11 years later, also on May 10, Romania gained
    its independence and in 1881, on May 10, Romania became a kingdom. Events were
    held in Bucharest and in the mountain resort of Sinaia to mark these
    celebrations. Prince Radu told Radio Romania about the importance of monarchy
    in the history of Romania:


    There were countries who did better than us at the time.
    But if you take a look and compare the great hardships that we had to endure in
    the last centuries, the fact that 150 years later we are all part of the European
    Union, and that the Royal House is close to the people, enjoying their respect
    and confidence, is a miracle. It is one of the reasons that makes each of us
    proud.




    Romanian productions competing in Cannes


    Romanian
    cinematography is again shining at the Cannes International Film Festival,
    which the French newspaper Telerama sees as a joker card for Romanians, who
    are genuinely valued in Cannes.Le Mondeis praising Cristi
    Puiu’s feature Sieranevada, which it describes as a classic ballet, a symphony
    of movement. Part of the official selection, the feature is competing for the
    Palme D’Or and was screened on Thursday. Cristian Mungiu is for the third time
    competing for the Grand Prize with his latest film Graduation. Another
    three Romanian productions are competing in Cannes: Bogdan Mirica’s Dogs,
    which is running in the Un Certain Regard section; 4:15 PM. The End of the
    World, directed by Catalin Rotaru and Gabi Virginia Sarga, competing in the
    short film section, while Alexandru Badea’s All Rivers Flow into the Sea
    is competing in the Cinefondation section.




    Great achievement for Romanian handball


    Last Sunday
    Romanian champions CSM Bucharest made history in Budapest. At its first ever
    participation in Champions League, the team won the trophy after a dramatic
    final against the odds-on favourite Gyor of Hungary. Seen as underdogs, CSM
    fought tooth and nail to win the match 29-26 at the penalty shootout. CSM thus
    becomes the third Romanian team to win the most important inter-club
    competition, after Stiinta Bacau in the 1960-1961 season and Rapid Bucharest in
    the 1963-1964 season.



  • The geopolitics of the missile defence shield in Europe

    The geopolitics of the missile defence shield in Europe

    Held under NATO’s umbrella, the anti-missile shield project in Europe has stirred heated debates since its very beginning, placing Russia and the North Atlantic Alliance on divergent positions. Moscow has continued to criticise Washington’s initiative and says it feels threatened by the shield currently under construction, while Western countries maintain the shield is only a defensive system that does not target Russia. Moscow insists on receiving legal guarantees that the shield is not directed against it, while NATO says that it has already provided such assurances.



    The Kremlin believes the implementation of the system “could infringe upon the strategic balance and undermine international security”. Meanwhile, the installation of the shield continues in Europe, including Romania. Furthermore, NATO has decided to set up command and control units in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania.



    During a meeting in Brussels, the NATO defence ministers announced the doubling of the size of the NATO rapid response unit to 30,000 soldiers. The move has triggered a prompt reaction from Moscow: “The opening up of additional military potential along our borders is nothing more than an attempt to exert pressure on Russia”, said Moscow’s envoy to NATO Alexander Grushko, who added that Russia’s response will be “adequate” in any case.



    According to envoy Alexander Grushko, “the serious changes in the military-political situation” along the Russian border will “naturally” lead to changes in Russia’s military planning, to ensure the country’s security. The decision “creates a great risk for Russia”, primarily in the Baltic states, which could become a region of “military confrontation”, says Grushko. He went on to say that the creation of a joint training centre in Georgia announced by NATO’s chief Jens Stoltenberg will also contribute to geopolitical tensions and threaten regional security: “The training centre in Georgia is a step that cannot be considered anything but provocation. There is no necessity for NATO to create any (training) centres.” Grushko also pointed out that the countries in the Black Sea region are capable of ensuring their own security. The Russian envoy added that for Moscow the founding act of relations between Russia and NATO “remains one of the cornerstone agreements which stems from understanding that security can be enhanced only through cooperation.”