Tag: District

  • The History of a Troublesome Neighborhood: Ferentari

    The History of a Troublesome Neighborhood: Ferentari

    The history of this area has been recently brought to light through a book entitled ‘Ferentari Incomplete, coordinated by Andrei Razvan Voinea, Dana Dolghin and Gergely Pulay. The development of this ill-famed district starts in the period between the two world wars, when Ferentari lied on the outskirts of Bucharest. Lets find out more from historian Andrei Razvan Voinea:



    The development of the Ferentari district started off on the wrong foot, so to say, because it was built around Ferentari Road, a road leading nowhere. It started in Calea Rahovei and ended up in an empty field, where there were the vineyards of the metropolitan bishopric and other monasteries. These plots of land were eventually divided up and gradually a lot of houses cropped up, turning the district into a residential area, more or less formal. The small rents here attracted a lot of workers, mainly those working in the Bucharests first real industrial area, at Filaret Hill. And this is how the districts development kicked off back then. Its development was agonizingly slow, and until 1940, the district was known as Happy Field, because the former vineyards here had turned into pubs. At a certain time, there were close to one hundred pubs in the area, and one of the streets was known as Happy Street. For this reason this part of Bucharest wasnt referred to as a district. It was known as Happy Field, and until 1940 it was completely underdeveloped, ignored by the central authorities, without sewerage, running water and the likes.



    Besides poor workers, small businesses started to appear in Ferentari between the two world wars. Some of the few well off here managed to build better houses, even villas in some areas, but these were quite few in number.



    Here is historian Andrei Răzvan Voinea at the microphone again:


    “There were several small businesses in Ferentari. One such business was the one belonging to a Jewish entrepreneur called Littman, who in 1935 hired architect Paul Rossini to design this beautiful modern house in a style which used to be very much en vogue in Europe at the time. This is one of the few examples of beautiful villas in the aforementioned district. Another one is Villa Coca, located at number 43 on the same Happy Street, which also boasts a very warm, balanced architecture. Unfortunately, the entrepreneur Littman fell victim to the Iron Guard rebellion, which also affected Ferentari.



    However, it was the communist regime that followed which kicked off a real process aimed at streamlining the district in an attempt to offer decent life conditions to workers. And they managed to achieve this goal to a certain extent.


    Blocks of flats were built out of bricks in a vacant area here, and are known to this day as the Red Blocks of Flats. Here is Andrei Răzvan Voinea again:


    “New blocks of flats were to be built on this vacant place, bought by the Public Servant Institute around 1946. The plot was taken over by city hall two years later, and the construction of a very functional housing project consisting of 20 blocks of flats commenced. The architect was called Gheorghe Popov, and the communists basically invented a kind of communal living. It is a space that is conceived totally differently from the model of home lots and individual gardens arranged horizontally. This was vertical development. These are blocks of flats with four stories, with green spaces in between, and lots of social services. There were 20 apartment buildings, with about 30 families each, so about 600 families moved there. The buildings had their own hot water plants, close by they had a kindergarten and a cinema theater. When the buildings were finished, they built a swimming pool, which was open until right after 1990. Right as you turned onto Ferentari Road you had all sorts of shops, as well as a barber shop. It was a sort of self-managed small town.



    Things started going downhill, however, around the mid-1960s, and got gradually worse to this day. The explanation as to why is supplied by historian Andrei Razvan Voinea:


    “What happened after 1966? The communists, after building the red blocks, don’t do much. They built a school, somewhere on the fringe. They also build a main sewage line for this entire segment, and set up street lighting. These are not major works, they are just regular interventions. A city plan was issued in 1966 for the entire area. These were the city limits, and in 1966 they came up with a very serious plan designed by the Project Bucharest Institute, with blocks of flats being part of the project. This involved razing the rural area of houses on the city edges, to be replaced by apartment buildings. They took great care to begin this project of urban renewal on empty lots. Even though they were planning to raze everything to the ground and build apartment buildings all along Ferentari Road, somehow these blocks were built only in certain isles, which did not face the road directly, but were behind ground houses, even though they had all the proper infrastructure, such as heating, street lighting, and so on. There was an additional project, that of making buildings with smaller size apartments, such as single room units. They stuck to this type of city limit neighborhood, aimed at industrial workers, who come to Bucharest for work, make a family, and then move to another place. Again, Ferentari holds on to this feature, that of an interstitial, transit type of area. However, the project was abandoned. More apartment building isles were erected, in total over 150 single room apartment buildings, or two room apartment buildings, mostly inhabited by workers from the Vulcan factory. After these isles were built, the project was simply abandoned, and then national legislation was changed in 1973. It was a mess.



    After the major earthquake of 1977, a complex urban plan was conceived, but unfortunately almost nothing was done until the regime fell in 1989. This was followed by the chaotic transition of the 1990s, during which the authorities neglected the neighborhood, leading to a degradation of social conditions.


    (bill & CC)

  • The Institute – the Creative District and other projects which showcase the dynamism and cultural di

    The Institute – the Creative District and other projects which showcase the dynamism and cultural di

    In
    literature or science, sports or marketing, trade or visual arts, we come
    across various expressions of creativity, under many forms, be it the
    classical one – a painting or a book, an advertising banner or a bicycle – or
    a phone and laptop.






    According to its Facebook page, The Institute promotes Romania’s
    creative industries and aims to contribute to modernising Romania. One of
    their best known projects is called the Creative District and was launched in
    Bucharest, back in 2017.






    Words are beautiful and to the point, but let us now take a look at some
    facts. One of the projects has been recently carried out at the weekend, in
    three consecutive weeks. The Institute and the Institute for Public Policies
    (IPP), with the support of Electrica SA have shed light on two iconic buildings
    of the Creative District, situated in Bucharest’s old city centre.


    Ana Păun, communication expert with the Creative District (The
    Institute), explains:






    Ana Paun: This is one of the
    brand new projects that we develop at the Creative District. One of the
    conclusions drawn after the national census of 2011 was that 9 in 10 houses in
    Bucharest were completely or partially uninhabited. And I’m referring to a
    series of landmark buildings, of special importance for both the capital’s
    culture and heritage. There are so many extremely beautiful and valuable houses
    within the perimeter of the Creative District, but which are not inhabited
    today. And we thought we could draw the city inhabitants’ attention by lighting
    these houses on the inside, just like they would have been inhabited.








    Bucharest has been the guest city of this year’s edition of the Madrid
    Design Festival. Romania’s capital city mounted an exhibition devoted to the
    Creative District. The exhibition Bucharest Creative Quarter@Madrid Design
    Festival was supported by the Romanian Cultural Institute and The Institute,
    and it was opened to the public for a month and a half.






    Now, the Institute team is getting ready for new challenges. The first
    such challenge will be the 7th Romanian Design Week, hosted by
    Bucharest between May 17 and 26. This festival has grown by the year. In 2019 it supports and echoes the
    discourse of the local creative industries, underlining the major contribution
    of creative communities as well as the way in which they turn the capital into
    a truly European city. Ana Păun, communication expert with the Creative
    District, explains:








    Ana Paun: A series of
    creative hubs or clusters, I would say, have developed in our city along the
    years. One such hub is that at Industria Bumbacului S.A. or in other places
    like the Creative District, where there is a concentration of creative
    businesses, workshops and studios. The Romanian Design Week comes up with an
    itinerary of creative hubs. Each of them organises events, from parties to
    fairs and customised coffees- everything is part of this year’s edition of RDW.
    Naturally, there will also be a central exhibition, as usual. In 2019, it will
    be hosted by the BCR building in the University Square, a historical building which
    will be open to the public for the first time.








    The central exhibition will include over 200 works. So, the month of May
    will bring along not only scents of peony and lime-tree blossom but also many
    enticing offers.