Tag: Education and Training Monitor

  • Romania, in the European Commission’s Report on Education

    Romania, in the European Commission’s Report on Education

    The Romanian education system continues to lack performance, failing to reach the targets set for high quality schooling by 2020, the Education and Training Monitor released by the European Commission this fall reads. With an obsolete education system, in which pupils do not find joy and motivation to learn, with poorly paid teachers and a huge gap between rural and urban education, Romania has not made significant progress in recent times.



    In terms of budget allocations for education, although figures are on the rise, they continue to be below the European average that is 3.7% in 2016, as compared to the European average of 4.7% of the GDP. In the 2014-2017 time frame, the school dropout rate among 8th form graduates in the 18-24 age bracket stood at 18.1% as compared to the European average of 10.6%, and the 10% target set for 2020. However, there is a school dropout rate which is not included in statistics – that regarding youngsters who start high-school and abandon classes during the school year.



    Experts in education claim however that these targets were set sometimes in 2008-2009 based on the situation reported back then and of outlooks of the way in which our education system might progress. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that not all European countries started from the same ground when they set their targets.



    Ciprian Fartuşnic, director of the Institute for Education Sciences has more on the early school dropout rate: ”The situation is not at all good as regards this indicator because in 2009 we set the target at 11.3%. Practically, we want to reach this target by 2020. The projection was based on a moderate scenario, because we could have reached that target without much effort. But Romania was affected by the global economic crisis and things no longer happened as planned and now we are far from reaching that target. The rate currently stands at some 18%. Now, one in five Romanians fails to graduate the 10th form.”



    As regards higher education in Romania, the average number of university graduates continues to be far from the European average, with some exceptions, says Ciprian Fartuşnic: “The situation is slightly better as regards the indicator regarding tertiary education student attendance rate, that is university studies. A reference group, namely the 30-34 age bracket, is close to reach the envisaged target set for 2020. We are one of the countries which have made significant progress in this field, as compared to 2010. Tertiary education is currently the only one benefiting from an adequate level of funding of the overall budget allotted to education, close to the EU average. In exchange, the percentage of expenses in the total amount of expenses for education in the preschool, primary and secondary school systems is much, much smaller and I believe that the main message of the EU Education and Training Monitor is the need for reconsidering some measures and initiating new support programs for the foundation of the education system represented by these levels. Because we risk having polarization: children who manage to graduate from higher education institutions and even go further with MA or doctoral studies and children (one in five) who do not manage to complete basic education.”



    Even if, in Romania, only 45% of the students pass the Baccalaureate exam, there are students who obtain spectacular results. Every year, thousands of students participate in national and international Olympiads and some of them are admitted at some of the most prestigious universities of the world.



    The same school produces both geniuses and illiterates, says education expert Ciprian Fartuşnic: “If our education system was really down, as many have labeled it, there wouldn’t be so many students able to meet the education requirements abroad, in the foreign countries where they accompany their parents, we wouldn’t have students participating in Olympiads, we wouldn’t have so many students admitted at famous universities in the West or occupying important professional positions. But the big problem we have is that these students are only one side of the whole story. On the other side there the many children who have difficulty in keeping up with the school requirements and who eventually drop out of school. According to a study we have made, there are hundreds of thousand of children who drop out of school. That is why it is very important to focus, in the future, on measures to prevent this phenomenon. Because, once a child has become used to not going to school, it will be very difficult to bring him back to school. The school system entitled “A second chance” is functioning where there are schools with such a program, but, at national level, the distribution of centers and schools that offer “A second chance” is very different. Therefore it’s better to fight for a first chance, so that each and every child should be able to find in school a place where to reach their potential, to feel safe and encouraged. Quite often, schools are one of the causes of school dropout because they don’t manage to sufficiently adapt their educational offer and their teaching strategies to the needs of children, which are so different.”



    The European study also shows that between 2014-2017 the employment rate of fresh graduates (the 20-34 age bracket) was 76% as against a European average of 80.2%. The higher education graduates account for 87.4%, which is more than the EU average of 84.9%.


  • Education in 2015

    Education in 2015

    Now in
    its fourth edition, the European Union’s Education and Training Monitor
    captures the evolution of Europe’s education and training systems and the way
    in which they impact the socio-economic background. By and large, the document
    stipulates that investments are still needed, to render education more
    inclusive, and also to stimulate social
    mobility. Therefore, one of the most natural investments is the one in
    education, by earmarking a bigger sum from the state budget. This is one of the
    conclusions highlighted by the head of the European Commission Representation
    in Bucharest, Angela Filote.


    Angela Filote: Another
    correlation we could notice is the one between the budget earmarked for education
    and the performance of the sector. And as regards this chapter, Romania is at
    the bottom of the list across the European Union, with a tendency of reducing
    even further the budget for education. I hope that this tendency, which in no
    way honors Romania, will not continue. I’d also like to see that the budget for
    education is used in an efficient and effective way, since many times we see that
    the main problem is how the money is used. And there’s yet another
    important thing about education. This field impacts not only the economy, but
    also society in its entirety. A population benefiting from an adequate level of
    education is less likely to run the risk of being faced with marginalization
    and social exclusion. There’s a saying in Romania, which goes something like
    ‘No schooling, no fair share of anything’. And in Romania, there are a great
    many children who don’t have their fair share of books. Such a phenomenon is
    rampant in rural areas, in the underprivileged as well as in the Rroma
    communities.


    School
    dropout rate indicators also reflect the condition of people in the rural
    areas, all the more so as school dropout occurs because of the gap between the
    rural and the urban environment. In this respect, Romania is placed above the
    European average, with 18.1 %, as against 11.1%, and the situation is much
    worse in the rural areas, as compared to the urban ones. Actually,
    socio-economic and educational disparities between the city and the village in
    Romania make an invariable indicator in the aforementioned report.
    Unfortunately, such disparities are in no way balanced out by better
    educational results. PISA tests have revealed that pupils under the age of 15
    stand at a lower level when it comes to reading, accounting for 37.3 %, as
    compared to the EU average level of 17.8%, for pupils in the same age bracket.
    The same goes for Mathematics, 40.8%, as against the 22.1% average across the
    European Union, or Sciences, 37.3% as compared to the European average of 16.6 %.



    Apart
    from the recommendation to implement the strategies that have been already
    developed, the European Commission also had other messages for Romania. With
    details on that, here is a member of the European Commission’s Directorate
    General for Education and Culture Florin Popa.


    Florin Popa: Inequality, socio-economic and educational disadvantages are correlated.
    Inequity starts quite early, and most of the times it is passed from one
    generation to another, and, unless it is remedied in due time, it gets worse.
    It is not the kind of problem that would find
    a solution by itself, in time. On the contrary, it gets worse.
    Socio-economic and educational
    indicators are not only correlated, but this correlation is even more
    intense in the case of underprivileged categories, who are in a vulnerable
    position. Therefore, the main point of intervention should be early education,
    starting even before pre-school. It is there that the most effective
    interventions can be made with regard to bridging social gaps. The second
    matter is that of political accountability. We do have a regulatory framework,
    but this just lies in the background if it is not given
    the opportunity to become the desired element of change. Again, it’s about the
    coherence and complementarity between various strategies.


    Recently
    appointed Education Minister, Adrian Curaj, the former Director General of the
    Executive Unit for Financing Higher Education, Research, Development and
    Innovation (UEFISCDI), believes that innovation could be a solution, even for
    bridging educational gaps. According to him, innovative educational policies
    are needed, able to combine the autonomy of education institutions with
    governmental strategies.


    Adrian Curaj: The
    idea of bridging gaps is something amazing. It translates into the perseverance
    of seeing something through, step by step. I would like to find the innovation
    or invention that would help me achieve this. But apart from ability, of which
    we think we have plenty, we also need the willingness to experiment. And while
    I strongly believe in Romanians’ ability to be creative, I am not that sure of
    our entrepreneurial skills. Romania’s chance is creativity and education. These
    two can make a difference, together with the competitiveness generated by
    people’s strength and resourcefulness.


    Another conclusion of the EU Education
    and Training Monitor is that Member States should work together and exchange
    ‘know-how’ in order to improve their response to the challenges in their
    education systems.