Tag: environment

  • Pollution, a big problem in Bucharest

    Pollution, a big problem in Bucharest

    Two years ago, the air quality in Bucharest fell below the accepted standards. Whereas according to measures implemented across the EU, there must not be more than 35 days a year with pollution values above normal limits, in Bucharest there were 70 days when levels were over 30% above the limit.



    After the information concerning the air quality in Bucharest was circulated heavily in the media, on Monday the Minister for Environment, Waters and Forestry Costel Alexe visited the air quality monitoring unit in central Bucharest, and took the opportunity to lash at the Bucharest Mayor General, Gabriela Firea, for failing to implement any of the measures proposed in this respect.



    The City Hall was no late in retorting. In a news release, Gabriela Firea says what has not been done in decades cannot be made up for in 36 months. According to her, the independent air quality measurement networks, administered by the Environment Ministry, are not authorised or certified. The quality indices the Ministry mentioned are temporary values recorded in the monitoring units by other methods than gravimetric analysis, and as such they are not validated.



    The Mayors list of measures already taken includes the upgrade of the public transport system in Bucharest over the past 3 years. The Municipality earmarked 474 million euros from the local budget and non-reimbursable EU funds for the purchase of 830 new buses and other transport means. As many as 400 new buses are already in circulation in Bucharest, while another 130 Mercedes Benz hybrid buses will reach the city this spring, and plans are afoot for the procurement of another 100 trolleybuses, 100 electric buses and 100 trams.



    Mayor Gabriela Firea also mentioned that the routes of 5 heavily used tram lines have been separated from the rest of the traffic, that nearly 30,000 vouchers for bicycle purchases were distributed between 2017 and 2019, and that in 2018 a project was launched targeting the construction of 4 bicycle lanes totalling over 48 km. An eco-voucher system has been initiated, in order to eliminate highly polluting vehicles, and a pilot project has been put in place with respect to school buses.



    Last but not least, as of this month Bucharest has introduced the OXIGEN vignette sticker programme, aimed at introducing road taxes resulting in reducing traffic in the city centre and consequently in improving air quality. The money collected under this programme will be used exclusively for environment protection measures.


    (translated by: Ana-Maria Popescu)

  • Romanians’ perceptions of climate change

    Romanians’ perceptions of climate change

    Between the 20th and the
    27th of September, a number of environmental organisations held
    protests and carried out activities intended to draw the attention of the
    competent authorities about the level of pollution and its undeniable toxic
    effects. Madalina Scarlat, one of the initiators, says Fridays for Future
    actions have taken place in Romania this year, first in Bucharest:




    We then gathered in other cities as
    well to protest and to put together this campaign which took place all week
    between the 20th and the 27th. This was intended to
    coincide with the Climate Week and the UN Summit in New York, where the
    representatives of the Fridays for Future movement went in an effort to
    persuade the world’s governments to recognise the state of climate emergency in
    which we find ourselves and take the necessary measures to reduce the impact of
    climate change.




    A protest march held on the 20th
    of September that began outside the National Library in Bucharest and which was
    attended by around 1,000 teenagers, was followed by other activities carried
    out in 75 partner schools. The actions are wide-ranging but are primarily
    intended to inform and encourage pupils to make their own small contribution to
    preventing an even faster pace of global heating and pollution. It’s all based
    on the idea that any individual contribution counts because it adds to other
    similar contributions, says Madalina Sacrlat:




    Each and every one of us can
    contribute something small, which, together with other small actions, can cause
    significant improvement. The fact that we don’t use so much plastic, that we
    use our own bottles, that we don’t put fruit and vegetables we buy at the
    market in plastic bags, but bring our own tote bags to carry them, all these
    individual actions, apart from convincing others to do the same, have a larger
    impact together.




    However, according to an opinion
    poll measuring Romanians’ perceptions about climate change and global warming,
    only 6% of respondents have heard about #fridaysforfuture, the actions
    initiated by the activism of the Swedish teenager Greta Thunberg, while two
    thirds have heard about Earth Hour, with 36% taking part. Moreover, 73% of
    Romanians have never heard of the Paris agreement. On the other hand, the poll
    indicates that many are concerned about environmental issues.




    96% of respondents said they know
    about global warming, while 86% of them said that global warming is a serious
    issue. This might sound optimistic if we compare the data to the results of
    another survey carried out in 2009. At the time climate change was a reason for
    concern for only 16% of Romanians. Now, a little over 25% believe that climate
    change is the second most important challenge at global level after poverty.
    What are the reasons behind this change in perception? Sociologist Dan Jurcan.




    Media coverage has worked very well
    in this respect. It’s not enough to see politicians talking about the Paris
    accord. The latest meteorological phenomena have been more impactful in this
    sense, even locally. This year alone we’ve had two small tornadoes which caused
    damages in Romania, while last year we had a similar phenomenon in Timisoara.
    It’s clear that the impact of climate change on small communities produces
    changes in the behaviour and perception when the event reaches the news.




    According to the same study, only
    75% of respondents expressed an interest in waste collection or greening
    campaigns, as compared to the 86% who declared an interest for forestation
    campaigns. Still, the degree of participation is lower in the case of the
    latter, 33%, as compared to the former, 38%. This is why we need to move from
    intention to action, as well as to strike a balance between citizens’
    expectations and the authorities’ achievements, Dan Jurcan says.




    If the population had a solid green
    education, then behaviours would be different too. For instance, our study
    reveals that Romanians claim they are recycling waste selectively, whereas we
    know this is not the case in reality. And citizens are not to blame for these,
    their good intentions are there. More often than not the responsibility lies
    with the authorities and companies that take care of waste collection. There
    are success stories about local authorities who have provided people with
    waste-collection bags of different colours, to separate household waste from
    plastic, paper and glass. And people have complied, which is a sign that they
    are willing to take on a more eco-friendly behaviour. This is what our study
    shows. The authorities simply need to create a suitable framework.




    To conclude, although the study
    could play down any initial outburst of optimism when reading its findings,
    there’s one thing that gives us reasons to rejoice: Romanians are concerned
    about environment issues. Dan Jurcan:




    When the topic is perceived as a
    highly important social issue, it’s normal to have positive results,
    commensurate to the topic’s importance. But it’s worth noting that the public
    has grown aware of such issues and people are talking about them. So, climate
    change is not just on the Government’s agenda, something a number of
    researchers are trying to include on the public agenda. It’s already there.



  • Warnings from the European Commission

    Warnings from the European Commission

    On Thursday, Romania received from the European Commission a formal notice letter regarding its failure to observe some of the obligations it has as a member state. Thus, the country is facing infringement procedures in fields such as monitoring pollution, financial services, the use of firearms, illegal migration and child protection.



    The Commission has noticed that the modifications brought to the Energy Law have maintained the obligation to sell natural gas with priority on the Romanian market, which violates EU law and creates unjustified barriers to gas exports from Romania. Bucharest has two months to respond to the arguments put forward by the Commission. Otherwise, the Commission may decide to bring the matter before the Court of Justice of the EU.



    A similar action can be undertaken also if Romania does not get in line with the EU rules on motor insurance. The Commission believes that the national legislation in question, which obliges insurers to issue, for certain categories of vehicles, a policy valid only on Romanian territory, is contrary to the Motor Insurance Directive, which requires that third-party motor liability insurance policies cover the whole territory of the EU on the basis of a single insurance premium.



    Three of the infringement procedures target the Romanian Government’s inability to meet its commitments with regard to combating pollution. As regards air quality monitoring, the European Commission speaks of a systemic failure.



    In Bucharest, the Ministry of the Environment has reacted immediately to the warnings. It has acknowledged the problem and promised to restructure the national air quality monitoring network. A communiqué issued by the ministry reads that, lately, Romania has taken important steps towards modernizing the network and rendering it more effective.



    With regard to greenhouse gases, Romania is at least two years behind in terms of compliance, but the ministry says that Bucharest has made significant progress in this field as well, and a new law is currently being drafted .



    Romania is not the only country to have received warnings from the European Commission. In total, in July, the European Commission sent 130 such formal notice letters, including to Belgium, Czechia, Estonia, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, Hungary and Spain. Austria, too, has received a reasoned opinion, due to the incompatibility of its law on the indexation of family benefits and family tax credits with EU rules. Such indexation also affects the Romanian citizens working in Austria who contribute to the social security fund.


  • The Week in Review, August 10-17

    The Week in Review, August 10-17

    Clashes at the rally of Romanian expats in Bucharest


    Over 450 people, including 35 gendarmes, received medical treatment further to the clashes on Friday night at the rally in Victoriei Square, a gendarme spokesperson told a press conference on Saturday. Some 100,000 people gathered on Friday in front of the Government headquarters in Bucharest, at a rally of Romanian expats, joined by many locals. Also on Friday, in several cities in the country, tens of thousands of people took to the streets to voice their solidarity with the protest of diaspora members, chanting anti-government slogans. The protesters, disgruntled with the current government formed by the Social Democratic Party and the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats, demanded the resignation of the cabinet and early elections. There were clashes between the protesters and the gendarmes, and the riot police used tear gas and water cannons to disperse the crowd. Police reported the presence of groups of provocateurs in front of the Government headquarters. The gendarmes moved in after some of their colleagues were attacked. The President of the country Klaus Iohannis firmly condemned the brutal police intervention against the protesters in Victoriei Square and said the Interior Minister, Carmen Dan, must immediately present explanations for how the ministry handled the events. Opposition leaders also criticised the response of riot police, and asked for the resignation of the Interior Minister. Previously, politicians in Power had said the Opposition should take responsibility for the rally.



    Inflation likely to drop in 3rd quarter, National Bank says


    The National Bank of Romania lowered its year-end inflation forecast from 3.6% to 3.5%. Estimates for 2019 were also cut, from 3% to 2.7%, Governor Mugur Isarescu announced. He explained that the inflation rate might get back into the range targeted by the central bank, unless new shocks appear, whose effects cannot be influenced by the monetary policy. On the other hand, Romania’s economic growth rate forecast by the National Bank for this year is nearly 4%, as against 7% in 2017. Mugur Isarescu believes it is better for the economy to grow steadily on long-term, in keeping with its potential. With higher economic growth rates come more investments, higher productivity and better workforce, the central bank chief explained.



    Foreign Ministry and Defence Ministry present reports


    After the recent presentation by PM Viorica Dancila of the performance of her Cabinet six months into its term in office, each ministry presented a report on its activity so far and on its projects for the near future. On Tuesday, the Foreign Minister Teodor Melescanu and Defence Minister Mihai Fifor held a press conference to this end. In the field of diplomacy, one widely debated topic is the prospective relocation of Romania’s embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. According to Teodor Melescanu, an analysis of the situation has been completed and will soon be sent to the Presidency, the Prime Minister and Parliament. As regards Romania’s relations with Russia, he said bilateral dialogue must be based on the interests of both parties and comply with the principles and standards of international law. The Foreign Ministry also said that preparations for Romania’s taking over the rotating presidency of the Council of the EU in the first half of 2019 were going as planned. As a NATO member, one of Bucharest’s priorities is to strengthen its position within this organization. The latest NATO Summit approved Romania’s proposal to host a 3-star command centre. A special meeting was also organized, devoted to security in the Black Sea area, and Romania secured a considerable increase of NATO member naval forces in the region. Also in the defence sector, Mihai Fifor added that efforts continued to upgrade the equipment of the Romanian Army, for which 2% of the GDP has been earmarked. Some of the achievements of the first 6 months include the procurement of American missile systems and the start of procurement procedures for 4 multirole corvettes. The main challenge facing the Defence Ministry, Mihai Fifor also said, is the development of the Cantacuzino Military Healthcare Institute, whose situation has deteriorated in recent years. Authorities hope that its transfer under the authority of the Defence Ministry last December will be a new start for the institution.



    Proactive environmental policies


    The Romanian Minister of the Environment Minister Gratiela Gavrilescu has announced several regional meetings with the general public to discuss waste management topics. The Minister has also added that 9,000 households without electricity will receive photovoltaic systems under a project called “The Centennial of Light.” Authorities want electricity to be supplied to every single household in Romania, and the installation of the first PV systems might begin as early as this year. Another project run by the Ministry is the launch of a scrapping programme for home appliances. Gratiela Gavrilescu says the ministry has sufficient funding to initiate this programme. The exact worth of the vouchers to be awarded under this programme is to be decided on and made public by mid-August. On the other hand, in its meeting scheduled for August 20, the Government will discuss the proposed issue of 30,000 additional vouchers for the 2018 edition of the car scrapping programme. So far 21,000 vehicles have been purchased under this programme.



    Romanian teams playing in Europa League


    3 Romanian football sides played on Thursday the first leg of the 3rd preliminary round of Europa League. Vice-champions FCSB (formerly known as Steaua Bucharest) drew, 0-0, against the Croatian team Hajduk Split. Kicked out of the Champions League by the Swedish side Malmo FF, Romanian champions CFR Cluj won easily against the Armenian team Alashkert, 2-0. In turn, the winners of Romania’s Cup, CSU Craiova, were defeated 3-1 by RB Leipzig of Germany. The return leg is scheduled for next week.

  • The Week in Review, August 5-11, 2018

    The Week in Review, August 5-11, 2018

    Clashes at the rally of Romanian expats in Bucharest


    Over 450 people, including 35 gendarmes, received medical treatment further to the clashes on Friday night at the rally in Victoriei Square, a gendarme spokesperson told a press conference on Saturday. Some 100,000 people gathered on Friday in front of the Government headquarters in Bucharest, at a rally of Romanian expats, joined by many locals. Also on Friday, in several cities in the country, tens of thousands of people took to the streets to voice their solidarity with the protest of diaspora members, chanting anti-government slogans. The protesters, disgruntled with the current government formed by the Social Democratic Party and the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats, demanded the resignation of the cabinet and early elections. There were clashes between the protesters and the gendarmes, and the riot police used tear gas and water cannons to disperse the crowd. Police reported the presence of groups of provocateurs in front of the Government headquarters. The gendarmes moved in after some of their colleagues were attacked. The President of the country Klaus Iohannis firmly condemned the brutal police intervention against the protesters in Victoriei Square and said the Interior Minister, Carmen Dan, must immediately present explanations for how the ministry handled the events. Opposition leaders also criticised the response of riot police, and asked for the resignation of the Interior Minister. Previously, politicians in Power had said the Opposition should take responsibility for the rally.



    Inflation likely to drop in 3rd quarter, National Bank says


    The National Bank of Romania lowered its year-end inflation forecast from 3.6% to 3.5%. Estimates for 2019 were also cut, from 3% to 2.7%, Governor Mugur Isarescu announced. He explained that the inflation rate might get back into the range targeted by the central bank, unless new shocks appear, whose effects cannot be influenced by the monetary policy. On the other hand, Romanias economic growth rate forecast by the National Bank for this year is nearly 4%, as against 7% in 2017. Mugur Isarescu believes it is better for the economy to grow steadily on long-term, in keeping with its potential. With higher economic growth rates come more investments, higher productivity and better workforce, the central bank chief explained.



    Foreign Ministry and Defence Ministry present reports


    After the recent presentation by PM Viorica Dancila of the performance of her Cabinet six months into its term in office, each ministry presented a report on its activity so far and on its projects for the near future. On Tuesday, the Foreign Minister Teodor Melescanu and Defence Minister Mihai Fifor held press conferences to this end. In the field of diplomacy, one widely debated topic is the prospective relocation of Romanias embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. According to Teodor Melescanu, an analysis of the situation has been completed and will soon be sent to the Presidency, the Prime Minister and Parliament. As regards Romanias relations with Russia, he said bilateral dialogue must be based on the interests of both parties and comply with the principles and standards of international law. The Foreign Ministry also said that preparations for Romanias taking over the rotating presidency of the Council of the EU in the first half of 2019 were going as planned. As a NATO member, one of Bucharests priorities is to strengthen its position within this organization. The latest NATO Summit approved Romanias proposal to host a 3-star command centre. A special meeting was also organized, devoted to security in the Black Sea area, and Romania secured a considerable increase of NATO member naval forces in the region. Also in the defence sector, Mihai Fifor added that efforts continued to upgrade the equipment of the Romanian Army, for which 2% of the GDP has been earmarked. Some of the achievements of the first 6 months include the procurement of American missile systems and the start of procurement procedures for 4 multirole corvettes. The main challenge facing the Defence Ministry, Mihai Fifor also said, is the development of the Cantacuzino Military Healthcare Institute, whose situation has deteriorated in recent years. Authorities hope that its transfer under the authority of the Defence Ministry last December will be a new start for the institution.



    Proactive environmental policies


    The Romanian Minister of the Environment Gratiela Gavrilescu has announced several regional meetings with the general public to discuss waste management topics. The Minister has also added that 9,000 households without electricity will receive photovoltaic systems under a project called “The Centennial of Light. Authorities want electricity to be supplied to every single household in Romania, and the installation of the first PV systems might begin as early as this year. Another project run by the Ministry is the launch of a scrapping programme for home appliances. Gratiela Gavrilescu says the ministry has sufficient funding to initiate this programme. The exact worth of the vouchers to be awarded under this programme is to be decided on and made public by mid-August. On the other hand, in its meeting scheduled for August 20, the Government will discuss the proposed issue of 30,000 additional vouchers for the 2018 edition of the car scrapping programme. So far 21,000 vehicles have been purchased under this programme.



    Romanian teams playing in Europa League


    3 Romanian football sides played on Thursday the first leg of the 3rd preliminary round of Europa League. Vice-champions FCSB (formerly known as Steaua Bucharest) drew, 0-0, against the Croatian team Hajduk Split. Kicked out of the Champions League by the Swedish side Malmo FF, Romanian champions CFR Cluj won easily against the Armenian team Alashkert, 2-0. In turn, the winners of Romanias Cup, CSU Craiova, were defeated 3-1 by RB Leipzig of Germany. The return leg is scheduled for next week.


    (translated by: Ana-Maria Popescu)

  • Initiatives for Cleaner Air

    Initiatives for Cleaner Air


    Every year, over 400,000 Europeans die prematurely because of air pollution, with many more suffering from respiratory and cardiovascular ailments for the same reason. 25,000 are from Romania. Romania, alongside other countries in the EU, namely the Czech Republic, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Hungary, Slovakia, and the UK, was recently warned on violating air pollution standards, and asked to take measures to remedy the situation. In the meantime, the Romanian Environment Ministry sent to Brussels a plan of proposals for reducing air pollution.



    Invited to Radio Romania, Dorina Mocanu, General Director of the Evaluation, Impact and Control of Pollution General Directorate, explained: “Evaluation of the air quality in Romania is done in 13 conurbations and 41 zones, in line with European directives. It is true that Romania, like many other European states, has a major problem with the high level of PM10 particles in suspension in some urban areas, the main cause being road traffic, home heating, and, less so but not insignificantly, construction sites. I want to specify that the infringement procedure was launched for three conurbations in Romania, namely Bucharest, Iasi, and Brasov, for too high a value for the PM10 index, particles in suspension, for which the Commission issued a warning in 2014.”



    In late January, upon the request of the European Commissioner for Environment, Karmenu Vella, Romania reported the stage of the measures taken by the local authorities in the three aforementioned conurbations, the timetable and the measures for the upcoming period.



    Here is Dorina Mocanu once again: “These measures can be divided into three categories: the ones having to do with road traffic and referring to traffic management, which includes the program of incentives for renewing the car fleet by scrapping old cars, the national program for creating an infrastructure for electric cars, modernizing public transportation, including shifting to electric public transportation. A second category of measures refers to residential heating measures for energy efficiency by insulating the building envelopes, by modernizing the heating system, installing heating systems that use renewable energy, replacing old heating systems with newer ones. Most of these measures are already being financed, or able to be financed, from environmental programs. And, last but not least, the third set of measures refers to green areas.”



    Greenpeace Romania is closely monitoring the situation, warning that there is a risk of fines amounting to hundreds of thousands of Euros a day. Alin Tănase, coordinator for energy campaigns with Greenpeace Romania, told Radio Romania that the most toxic substances are powders in suspension and nitrogen oxides, usually generated by cars.



    He told us what should be done to deal with this: “As far as I know, the deadline is in mid-March, when the Commission decides what states of the nine under warning will be sent to the European Court of Justice, implicitly resulting in fines. Not much has been done, which is why the Commission is threatening with fines. Because some cities have exceeded their limits for some pollution factors, they are obligated to put together plans to improve air quality. As far as we can see from the plans issued so far, I am referring to the plan in Bucharest, there are a series of measures that help more, others that help less, among them widening the boulevards — there are a few mentioned in the plan, because by this measure cars would run faster, which means that they would spend less time idling, producing less pollution. However, my opinion is that this is a back and forth measure, because if you widen the streets you encourage car traffic. In addition to this measure, there is another one that provides for several kilometers of bike paths separated from motorized traffic in the city, because a great problem we find with pollution in Bucharest is wind erosion, which stirs up the dust in areas devoid of vegetation. There are also measures of encouraging public transportation, even replacing the heavy polluters with electric means of transportation, and I am referring to electric buses.”



    In May, at the latest, Bucharest will have an Integrated Air Quality Plan, approved by the Minister of the Environment, Gratiela Gavrilescu.

  • The Green Planet

    The Green Planet

    Worried by the irreversible
    negative effects of building micro-hydropower stations on mountain rivers,
    environmentalists have launched a free interactive map and an app that allows
    anyone to contribute to the protection of rivers where such plants are built.
    The app was created by WWF Romania in association with ESRI Romania, in an
    attempt to draw attention to the fact that these hydropower projects are
    destroying unique and valuable mountain ecosystems. Rivers are dried and
    reduced to a trickle of water, while valleys that used to be green are now
    filled with building site waste and thick metal pipes.




    For years now,
    micro-hydropower plants have become a business of choice because they can be financed
    using European funds and yield high profits with the use of green certificates.
    Diana Cosmoiu, national policy coordinator for WWF Romania, explains:




    We created this
    interactive map in order to show the impact of hydroelectric projects on
    Romanian rivers, especially those with a high environmental value. So far, no
    such instrument has been available to the public, one that is both complex and
    easy to use. The app superimposes the locations of these hydropower stations
    over the maps of protected areas, highlighting rivers that are important from
    an ecological point of view. There are only a few rivers left in Romania that
    have not been affected by hydroelectric facilities and other types of projects.
    Apart from hydroelectric projects, there are also hydrotechnical projects that
    interfere with the course of the rivers and have an environmental impact by
    breaking up rivers, affecting the sediment and the migration of fish.




    The application can also be
    used on a smartphone, as Diana Cosmoiu from WWF Romania details:






    This app provides nature
    lovers, NGOs and anyone interested in such investments with information on the
    location of hydropower stations in relation to protected areas and
    environmentally important rivers. At the same time, nature lovers and NGOs can
    contribute to the protection of rivers by contributing new information gathered
    in the field. The map provides technical data about a certain hydropower plant,
    such as capacity and when it became operational. We can look up a specific
    river and see if there are any installations on it. We can also do all sorts of
    searches, by county, for example, or we can look up a certain investor. Locals
    who live around a hydropower station and people passing through the area, such
    as researchers, anglers and tourists, can access the map on their phones, and,
    using an app incorporated into the map, can upload information from where they
    are into the map. The information is reviewed by WWF, and, if verified, is
    incorporated into the map.




    One case that was recently in
    the media is the hydropower project in the Jiu Gorge National Park, in
    south-western Romania, which is to use 85% of the capacity of the Jiu River.
    Both the investor and the authorities have ignored the European legislation on
    nature conservation. There are many more such examples, to be found even in
    protected areas and these practices must be put an end to, the
    environmentalists say. Diana Cosmoiu WWF Romania:




    There are hundreds of
    installations that have been obstructing our rivers for decades. Many of them,
    around 100, do not appear on our map for lack of information. Some are very old
    projects, even clogged in some cases and therefore do not produce any power,
    but they still block the rivers and affect the local flora and wild life.
    What’s important is not the number of such projects, but their location. If you
    look at the map, you’ll see that it’s precisely the areas with high
    environmental value, high up in the mountains, that have the greatest potential
    to produce electricity, due to a high altitude differential, and these are the
    places in which investors are interested.




    Romania is not the only
    country in Eastern Europe that faces such problems. Drava, a river in Croatia
    that flows into the Danube and which forms part of the EU network called Natura
    2000, is threatened with the building of two large hydroelectric plants. Plans
    to build a hydropower plant also exist for Hron river in Slovakia, in spite of
    the fact that the middle section of the river has recently become a Natura 2000
    site to improve the conservation of its fish species.

  • Environmental activists against deforestation

    Environmental activists against deforestation

    The culture of non-violent resistance has already developed in Romania in various fields, environmental protection included. For instance, a few years ago, many public protests were staged in Bucharest against the situation in Rosia Montana, as well as against illegal tree-cutting and deforestation. Although wood exploitation is allowed only if certain requirements are met, regulations in the field have been constantly broken in the past 15-20 years, so the situation of Romanian forests has become dramatic.



    Today, only 27.45% of Romania’s territory is covered by woods, which is significantly below the European average of 32.4%. According to a study conducted by Greenpeace Romania, between 2000 and 2014 Romania lost 3 hectares of forest per hour. Actually, all Greenpeace activists as well as green activists from other NGOs were among the first to signal the tragic situation of forests in Romania. Volunteers, out of their own will or following notifications by regular citizens, walk regularly through the mountains and check whether trees are illegally cut and transported.



    However, proving that such activities are illegal is a difficult job, for which reason more vigilant eyes are needed in the forest, as the Greepeace programme coordinator Valentin Salageanu said: “I believe that the main problem that we need to solve, and we have been trying to do this, is to be present in as many places as possible. To this end, we have created an online platform, a website to which anybody can contribute and report illegal situations, as there are many people who love the mountain and many concerned citizens, who see that trees are cut in their villages. The site is called salvezpadurea.ro (in English “I save the forest”), and we check every notification registered on this site. If it’s a serious case and suspicions are confirmed, we go there and check the situation ourselves. “



    Gabriel Paun from Agent Green, recalls the beginnings of such on-site verifications: “Our activity started in the national parks, which theoretically are the most representative, because they are Romania’s natural heritage, home to most of the virgin forests. So, I would just go to a national park and follow the trucks carrying logs that were extremely big. I wanted to see where the wood was taken, because not only those who cut and carry the logs are responsible. There is an entire chain of responsibility here. The most guilty party is the one that orders the wood and subsequently sells it, in various forms and for various purposes.”



    Before going on field verification, the documents that must accompany any transport or cutting activity are verified, to make sure everything is legal. In this way, Valentin Salageanu and his colleagues can avoid risks.“There are all sorts of risks, ranging from common accidents, caused by the terrain, for instance. Then, there are risks resulting from the interaction with the people involved: forestry workers, local authorities or gendarmes. But there have been no serious incidents. Every time we go there we are very well documented, so that we have strong arguments in favor of us being entitled to be there. Everything we’ve done so far was to record or take pictures of illegal transports and present the evidence to the Forestry Guard. So, the authorities in charge could use our evidence in order to conduct their investigations.”



    Unfortunately, there have been situations in which people caught in illegal action by green activists became violent. Here is Gabriel Paun recalling such situations: “In principle, what we do is gather video and photo evidence. Most of the times I managed to stay hidden, far from scrutinizing eyes. Sometimes we would live the cameras there, to collect them later, but they eventually discovered and stole them. We only managed to recover one or two and we used the captions. Sometimes we do run into workers or even poachers, who are usually peaceful. However, there have been situations in which some of them have been really aggressive, and this is usually a sign that something is wrong about what they do. They are violent and people get hurt. It has happened to me, too.”



    For a year now, after the adoption of a new Forestry Code, government authorities have been developing additional tools to monitor wood exploitation. Here is the Greenpeace campaign coordinator Valentin Salagean again: “In the past years, starting with the 2015 anti-deforestation campaigns, progress has been made in rendering the sector more transparent. There is now a forest radar, a system that allows citizens to check whether a transport is illegal or not, without having to call the police. If the transport is illegal, then you can call the police. Last year a new website became functional too, inspectorulpadurii.ro, which provides information about current operations of wood exploitation. Still, the law under which this transparency is supposed to be achieved has not come into force yet, we are still in the trial period.”



    The bill making the application ‘inspectorul padurii’ a legal application has been delayed until October 21st, 2017. Environmental organizations, however, keep doing their job, with the aim of protecting Romania’s virgin forests in particular. In 2001, Romania used to host some 62% of Europe’s virgin forests. Unfortunately, many of them have been cut down ever since.

  • Romania Gets Environmental Infringement Notice

    Romania Gets Environmental Infringement Notice

    The European Parliament has recently adopted draft legislation increasing the share of waste to be recycled, as global economy is becoming more and more polluting. The share of waste to be recycled is to rise from 44% today to 70% by 2030. For packaging materials, such as paper and cardboard, plastics, glass, metal and wood, MEPs propose an 80% target for 2030, with interim 2025 targets for each material.



    The question arises, however, if member states have the capacity to conform to these new targets. Romanias representatives are rather sceptical. MEP and member of the European Peoples Party Marian-Jean Marinescu said:



    Marian-Jean Marinescu: “As a citizen, I want this percentage to rise because we all want to live in a cleaner environment. At the same time, however, we must consider the possibilities, and be realistic, while trying to do more.



    Referring to the situation in Romania, MEP and member of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats Maria Grapini notes that:



    Maria Grapini: “The problem is that on the one hand, Romania lacks the technology and investment in recycling technology, and on the other, it lacks the budget to be able to make these investments. I also believe that 2025 is a very close deadline for these targets, which are really high.



    “The problem of waste is very important, we have to address a number of infringements. We must adapt our model for economic development to a greener model, said the former minister for the environment, waters and forests Cristiana Pasca-Palmer at the end of her term. The new occupant of the post Daniel Constantin has announced that the European Commission has launched 10 infringement procedures against Romania because of its environmental problems:



    Daniel Constantin: “Three cities are currently facing an infringement procedure due to the high level of pollution, namely Bucharest, Iasi and Brasov. We are working with the respective local administrations to deal with the procedure. Unfortunately, most of Romanias problems in relation to the European Commission have to do with the environment. We have failed to meet many of the deadlines and commitments we have made, which has led to the launch of 10 infringement procedures against us, which means we are being monitored in these areas. Our problems are mainly to do with two large categories: waste and pollution.



    Romania is already facing a trial at the Court of Justice of the EU over its non-compliant waste deposits, and risks being penalised.

  • Actions to protect the environment

    Actions to protect the environment

    EU Commissioner for Regional Policy Corina Cretu has expressed her concern about the possibility of the alpine landscape being destroyed by the building of a waste dump in Suceava County, north-eastern Romania. That ecological landfill is designed to be built over an area of 4.4 hectares close to the summit of one of the most beautiful mountain passes in Romania: Mestecanis. The landfill is due to receive all household waste from the mountainous areas in Suceava County.



    Corina Cretu has expressed her concern over that project in an open letter to the Romanian Minister of the Environment, Waters and Forestry Gratiela Gavrilescu and to the Minister of European Funds Marius Nica. “The landscape of the Carpathian Mountains is one of the greatest natural assets in Romania and Europe, and I want to make sure that European funds are not used to endanger this invaluable resource, Corina Cretu pointed out. The EU official has thus joined the community of citizens and journalists who have warned about the construction of the landfill, which is in fact an integral part of a waste management project. The EU Commissioner has called on the Romanian authorities to see that the relevant legislation is observed when building the landfill, underscoring that all projects must comply with the legislation in force as regards the assessment of environment risks.



    That means that public and environment authorities, at both local and national level, must be consulted for the necessary licenses and approval to be obtained. Additionally, public consultations must be held in the first phases of the project. The project is seemingly aimed at developing a sound waste management system for the entire county, in keeping with the European environment legislation and Romanias objectives in the EU accession treaty in the field of waste management, Corina Cretu also said.



    Another environmental protection action was staged in Hunedoara County, south-western Romania, where dozens of activists from various regions and from abroad joined forces in a protest and an awareness-raising campaign with respect to illegal logging and abusive wood exports. Protesters are also displeased with construction works in protected areas, reserves, national parks or in their immediate vicinity, as well as with the construction of a small hydropower plant on the Alb River, one of the few rivers in Romania untouched by human hands. The protest came one week after a conflict in the Dinosaur Geopark, where environmentalists clashed with representatives of the company commissioned to build the hydropower plant on the River Alb, an incident that triggered an inspection of contractor licenses.

  • The Natura 2000 Directives Rescue Campaign

    The Natura 2000 Directives Rescue Campaign

    Losing biodiversity is one of the biggest environmental threats. Many species of birds and animals have gone extinct and habitats are in a degraded condition. For a sustainable management of biodiversity, the EU set up a network of protected areas based on two Directives, issued for the protection of Europes most precious natural areas. Thanks to those two major laws, Europe has more than 26,000 ground and marine sites, thus making the worlds largest network of protected areas, which accounts for about one fifth of the Europes land and around 4% of its sea area.



    There are 531 Natura 2000 sites in Romania, covering some 23% of the countrys surface. Romania holds the top position in Europe, in terms of biodiversity, holding the continents last 100% natural ecosystems.



    After years of sustained efforts for the preservation and protection of nature in Europe in its entirety, the European Commission has called for the assessment of the two Natura 2000 Directives, in order to find out if they are efficient in terms of environmental protection. For ecologists, that means the slackening of the legislative framework for the preservation of nature and the waste of a legislative and preservation progress that took them a good number of years to achieve. More than 100 NGOs from Europe, among which WWF and the Romanian Ornithological Society have jointly launched a campaign for the rescue of the two directives. The NGOs have called on all citizens who are concerned with the environment to sign the “Alert for Nature online petition.



    Ovidiu Bufnila, the Romanian Ornithological Societys PR has told us how important the two nature protection directives are: The Birds Directive was issued in 1970, when it was really needed. Back then, the white-tailed eagle was on the verge of extinction, for instance, and there were only a few pairs left in Europe. Were lucky to have that bird species in the Danube Delta and all along the Danube. It was saddening that such a majestic bird, actually Europes biggest eagle, was on the verge of extinction. Therefore, the Birds Directive was issued. It is a law setting clear-cut objectives as regards the protection of birds and animals in Europe. Then, in 1992, the Habitats Directive was issued, to regulate protected areas. Specifically, its about the habitats of wild animals, the environment and the air we breathe in the forests. Its about pastures and about areas where ecological balance can be restored with tremendous efforts. Therefore, the attack against these two directives can only bring about something very bad for the environment, for health.



    Many of the species have been kept alive and habitats have been preserved thanks to preservation projects, representatives of many NGOs say, also drawing attention to the danger posed by the undermining of the two laws. In Romania alone, the two directives provided the legal framework for the protection of such important sites as the Hartibaci Plateau in Transylvania, the Tarcu Mountains, Buila-Vanturarita, Gradistea Muncelului-Cioclovina, the Apuseni Mountains or the Danube Delta.



    Ovidiu Bufnila: The white-tailed eagle was on the brink of extinction, whereas now we have around 10 thousand pairs across Europe, not only in Romania, in the Danube Delta and along the river Danube, but also in Norway or France. Also, this bird was successfully reintroduced in Scotland. So little by little we can protect nature and can also bring certain species back to their habitats. It is the case of the brown bear in Spain. There were no brown bears left in Spain, but through the Natura 2000 network, the brown bear has returned there as well. Then we have the martens, the lynx, which disappeared at a certain moment in time. There were only a couple of dozens left, while now there are around 100 pairs. There are many wolves in Romania, but in other countries like Poland the species was on the brink of extinction. So were talking about a pan-European network, which will soon cover the whole of Europe. Thanks to this network, wild animals can recover, because figures look bad. 60% of the animals and plants of European importance are endangered, just like 77% of the habitats. No less than 25% of the sea mammals and 15% of the land mammals are endangered species in the European Union. Were talking about 38% of the freshwater fish, 42% of the freshwater clams, 22% of amphibians, 21 % of reptiles, dragonflies, birds and butterflies, as they are also on the brink of extinction.



    In the past decades, Europe lost hundreds of millions of birds, because intensive farming destroyed many habitats. Furthermore, constructions, pollution, the exaggerated exploitation of forests, oceans, rivers, lakes as well as climate change have had a negative impact on animals and their habitats.



    Ovidiu Bufnila underlines: “In the last 30 years, the EU lost 420 million birds. The main reason was intensive farming. The agricultural sector alone is responsible for the loss of 300 million birds, so we have 300 million birds less than in 1980. We also lost 60% of a certain species of butterfly. Going by the way farming is done these days, it is clear that it is the main enemy of Natura 2000 sites and nature in Europe. A lot is being done in terms of conservation, for instance a certain species of pelican, the largest in Romania, can still be encountered in the Delta and on the Danube, but at a certain point the population waned. Special projects appeared, and conservation measures were so effective as to bring the species back. Unfortunately, this year we lost 100 such pelicans because of the avian flu. In Bulgaria, where they still nest, ornithologists told us that 26 pelicans died because of the flu.



    The benefits brought in by the Natura 2000 network are estimated at 200 to 300 billion Euro a year. Around 1.5 billion Euro a year are benefits from marine sites. Also, Natura 2000 sites attract 2.5 billion visitors a year, and were created between 4.5 and 8 billion jobs within the EU.



    The online petition called “Alert for Nature, launched by one of the most important environmental NGOs in Europe, invite citizens from the 28 EU member states to a public consultation organized by the EC on this topic, before 24 July, to save the two Natura 2000 directives.

  • European Summit in Brussels

    European Summit in Brussels

    The leaders of the European Union Thursday reached what analysts have called “a historic agreement” on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 40% compared to 1990, by 2030. According to the Radio Romania correspondent in Brussels, the deal will be binding across the Union and will involve contributions from Member States. The 28 heads of state and government have also agreed on two related targets: to increase the share of renewable energy to 27% of the total consumption, and to cut by 27% the overall energy consumption.



    The incumbent president of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, has expressed his satisfaction with this achievement coming at the end of his term in office. “It was not easy, not at all, but we managed to reach a fair decision that sets the EU on an ambitious but cost-effective climate path,” he told a press conference in Brussels. Van Rompuy also said this was the most ambitious environment and energy policy target in the world.



    In turn, the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon hailed the EU decision to cut its greenhouse gas emissions. In a news release issued by the UN, the official says the decision proves the EU’s continuing global leadership in taking bold action to fight climate change. The UN Secretary General also says that Europe has proved that managing the global climate needs is in its own best interest, in the long run. Environment watchdogs on the other hand argue that the measures agreed on in Brussels are modest and they actually slow down the production of clean energy.



    Also on Thursday, the European Council approved new measures to reduce the Union’s energy dependence and to improve its energy security, both in terms of natural gas and of electricity. According to official news releases, the EU leaders decided that the Union’s foreign policy instruments must be used in order to convey consistent energy security messages, particularly to strategic partners and major suppliers. With the ongoing crisis in Ukraine and the problems in the Middle East, it has become clear that reducing Europe’s energy dependence is urgent and vital, Van Rompuy explained after the negotiations. This statement indicates the widespread concerns of the EU Member States regarding this coming winter, when Russia, an unpredictable supplier, may once again use its energy resources as an instrument to achieve its geopolitical goals.