Tag: Fiat

  • Automobiles in Communist Romania

    Automobiles in Communist Romania

    Automobiles have become so common
    today that it is almost impossible to imagine a world without them. Like any
    other invention in its early days, the automobile was present only in the lives
    of the affluent. However, in time, its rising popularity made it affordable to
    other people and thus it stopped being a symbol of belonging in a certain
    social category. Between 1945 and 1989, the automobile’s evolution in Romania saw
    some stages beginning with the restrictive one, when it was exclusively used by
    the state and the communist leadership, to a period when it was desired by the
    commoners as well. It went through a period of democratization as Serban
    Cornaciu, vice-chair of Retromobil Club Romania said. This period was kicked
    off by a low number of people, the ones who could afford it at that time.




    Serban Cornaciu: We cannot
    speak about this period of democratization, without speaking about car imports
    from the West. Those people were privileged because they had the courage to apply
    for buying such a luxurious product and they had well-paid jobs, being doctors,
    lawyers, artists. Most of them were interested in buying a Fiat 850 or a
    Renault 16 as Romania hadn’t started its car production yet. There were also very
    expensive models like Fiat 1800 and many of the applicants were being visited
    by officers of the former political police, the Securitate, because the state
    had a tight control on people’s incomes at that time and only a few could afford
    a car in the 1960s.




    Romania’s economy just like the others in Central and
    Eastern Europe was slowly recovering after the war and the process was also hindered
    by its being reorganized after the centralized soviet model. Furthermore,
    Romania wasn’t allowed to benefit from the Marshall plan and its economic
    recovery was dragging on. It was only in the late 60s, that two plants were
    built in Pitesti, southern Romania for the production of two models, Renault 8
    and 12, under the name of Dacia 1100 and Dacia 1300. At that time the then
    communist authorities wanted to give an impetus to the car market by producing
    local brands and importing some models from the other communist countries. Here
    is Serban Cornaciu at the microphone again






    Serban
    Cornaciu: At that time, you could
    subscribe to a waitlist for buying a car, apply for a loan and eventually you
    got it. In 1974, three versions of Dacia 1300, not very different from one
    another, became available. The cars used to come in a wide range of vivid
    colours until 1984 when a new model, Dacia 1310, had rolled off the assembly
    line. Cars from the communist bloc were also available on the market but
    imports from the West ceased shortly after the local production had begun. No
    Western brands were imported since 1971-72. One could only apply for a Lada
    1200, a Moskvich or a Trabant, produced in East Germany. Delivery periods for
    Trabant were shorter, though after 1988, applicants could wait even up to three
    years to get one.




    However, the systemic crisis that started to affect
    the communist regime in late 1970s, inevitably affected Romania’s car industry.
    Here is Serban Cornaciu again.




    Șerban
    Cornaciu: The models produced by
    Dacia Pitesti in the 1980s were changed and imports became increasingly
    difficult. Wait lists could no longer be made at the local dealers and people’s
    options started being trimmed in 1982-83. The plant in Pitesti started having
    delivery issues on the domestic market, because exports had become a priority.
    One can wait up to five years for a car and there were no colour options. They started
    using two-three colours back then. One year they were all painted in blue,
    another year green or white and so on. Vivid colours were no longer available.




    Restrictions for the drivers came one after the other
    and in 1978, Romania’s communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu issued orders that
    dignitaries and institutions use only Romanian cars. The crisis deepened in
    mid-1980s, with fuel shortages, driving restrictions at night and on Sundays.
    We’ve asked Serban Cornaciu about the used cars market in communist Romania.

    Serban Cornaciu: Cars were being sold by their owners; there was supply, there was
    demand and a second-hand market flourished back in the 80s. However, prices
    remained high in spite of the driving restrictions imposed by the communist
    authorities. Things went on like this, someone would buy a car but at the first
    snowfall authorities would issue a temporary driving restriction and the new
    owner had nothing to do but wait until the restrictions were lifted. Only
    communist leaders were allowed to travel in cars with yellow plates as well as members
    of the diplomatic corps or foreign residents in Romania whose number plates
    began with 12 B. For instance, famous Romanian director Sergiu Nicolaescu, who
    was shooting a lot of films back in the day, had to use this special type of
    plate in order to avoid being pulled over by the then road police which was known
    in Romania as ‘militia’.




    The real democratization of the automobile in Romania
    came only after 1989 and the change in the political regimes also brought
    changes to the relationship between cars and their owners.




    (bill)

  • Comisia Europeană a lansat o anchetă împotriva grupului suedez IKEA

    Comisia Europeană a lansat o anchetă împotriva grupului suedez IKEA

    Comisia Europeană a deschis
    o investigaţie amănunţită asupra grupului suedez IKEA, cel mai mare
    distribuitor mondial de mobilă, pe care îl bănuieşte că a beneficiat de
    avantaje fiscale incorecte din partea Olandei. În vizorul Executivului european se află Inter IKEA,
    societatea care exploatează activitatea de franciză a grupului. Aceasta este una dintre cele
    mai importante investigații lansate până acum de Bruxelles împotriva unei
    multinaționale suspectate de optimizări fiscale.

    Purtătorul de cuvânt al CE,
    Lucia Caudet a precizat: Uniunea Europeană a deschis o investigaţie
    amănunţită în privinţa avantajelor fiscale de care ar fi beneficiat în Olanda
    Inter Ikea, unul din cele două grupuri care gestionează afacerea Ikea. Ne
    exprimăm îngrijorarea că, în baza a două decizii fiscale luate de autorităţile
    olandeze în 2006 şi 2011, taxele plătite de grupul amintit ar fi fost reduse
    semnificativ, ceea ce i-ar oferit acestuia un avantaj necuvenit faţă de alte
    companii, care se supun aceloraşi reguli de impozitare olandeze, încălcându-se
    astfel prevederile UE referitoare la ajutoarele de stat.

    Executivul comunitar
    aminteşte că, la începutul anilor `80, IKEA şi-a schimbat
    modelul de business într-un model de franciză. În urma modificării, Inter IKEA nu deţine magazinele IKEA, ci toate magazinele grupului din întreaga lume plătesc o taxă de
    franciză de 3% din cifra lor de afaceri către Inter IKEA, o subsidiară a
    Inter IKEA Group cu sediul în Olanda. Investigaţia CE apare în urma unui
    raport prezentat de Partidul Verzilor în luna februarie 2016, în care aceştia
    au denunţat strategia de optimizare fiscală a gigantului suedez. Potrivit
    acestui document, acordurile financiare convenite de retailerul de mobilă cu
    autorităţile olandeze ar fi permis evitarea plății unor taxe de aproape un
    miliard de euro în perioada 2009-2014, scrie
    cotidianul Financial Times.

    Oficialii europeni vor efectua aşadar o
    investigaţie pentru a determina dacă acordul fiscal din Olanda încalcă
    reglementările europene, înainte de a estima ce economii fiscale a obţinut
    compania suedeză. Aceasta a dat asigurări că va coopera cu autorităţile de
    la Bruxelles în privinţa acordurilor fiscale convenite cu autorităţile olandeze. Începând
    din 2013, Comisia Europeană a analizat peste 1.000 de acorduri fiscale
    încheiate între statele membre şi companiile multinaţionale. În cele cinci
    investigaţii finalizate până acum, CE a cerut unui număr de patru state membre
    (Luxemburg, Olanda,
    Belgia şi Irlanda) să recupereze mai
    multe miliarde de euro de la aproape 40 de companii, printre care Starbucks (Olanda), Apple (Irlanda), Amazon
    şi Fiat (Luxemburg).