Tag: Phanariot

  • Cosmopolitan Bucharest

    Cosmopolitan Bucharest


    The 18th century, in the history of Romanian principalities,
    is known as the Phanariot century, broadly speaking. However, that timespan
    does not exactly coincide with the early and the late 1700s proper; in Moldavia
    it begins in 1711 and in Wallachia, in 1714. For both principalities, the
    Phanariot age ended in 1821. We recall that back then Tudor Vladimirescu’s revolution
    made it possible for the indigenous rulers to regain their thrones. During the Phanariot
    age, the Romanian Principalities were under the suzerainty of the Ottoman
    Empire. The sultan controlled the principalities in the region through a bunch
    of Greek civil servants who hailed from Istanbul’s Phanar district. They were
    the Phanariotes, the anointed ruling princes of Moldavia and Wallachia, for a
    limited period of time. The age was viewed and, quite aptly, still is, as an age
    of backwardness. The Romanian Principalities no longer were autonomous, they
    did not have their own currency and their own army. Besides, the Romanian
    principalities were getting Orientalized at a fast pace. The historian Tudor Dinu gives us all the details.

    Tudor Dinu:

    The age is a very interesting one because,
    on one hand, it marks the Orientalization process as, prior to the Phanariotes,
    Oriental culture was seldom present with us. For instance, in the markets
    around Bucharest all sorts of delicious produce were available for purchase. Then
    again, it also marks the incipient Westernization, since to a considerable
    extent the Phanariotes were the driving force for the advent of the Italian and
    then the French culture in the Romanian Principalities. The research that I
    carried revealed that it was not true that Westernization began after 1821. As
    for the Phanariotes, they did keep themselves abreast of Western civilization
    primarily because they wanted to provide intelligence services to the Porte, so
    that was another reason for the Western culture to make its presence felt with
    us.


    At first, Western customs and patterns had an unassuming presence
    in our society, being influenced by the fact that the Romanian Principalities
    were used more like a war theater for the conflicts between Austria, Russia and
    Turkey. Westernization proper began with the first Austrian occupation after
    1789. It was enhanced through the arrival of the Russian troops stationed in
    the Principalities, that including Bucharest. however, those were not the first
    foreigners who settled in Wallachia’s capital city, which beginning the Phanariot
    age, became a truly cosmopolitan city. Those foreigners, who in time became people
    of the place, also created the mixed specificity of the city. For instance, together
    with the Phanariotes a growing number of Greeks settled here, yet their community
    did not account for more than 5% – 10% of the entire population of Bucharest. It’s
    just that they were scholars, dignitaries, entrepreneurs, merchants and craftsmen,
    so they did step out of the line as against the rest of the population.


    As for the other foreigners in the city…who were they?

    Tudor Dinu:


    First off, it’s about the Jews, a very
    dynamic population, they were harassed by the Christian population instigated
    by the clergy, yet they were protected by the Phanariot rulers. Their contribution
    was fundamental, to the economic progress of Bucharest since they were tailors,
    bookbinders, metal workers. A dynamic presence was provided even by the
    Armenians who at that time may have been known as ‘Christian Jews’, since their
    customs were similar and so was their way of doing business. The Rroma were a very
    large population as well, at that time they were known as gypsies, tigani in
    Romanian. Their contribution was significant considering the difficult jobs the
    Romanian wouldn’t take, such as metal and iron work, but also the panning of gold
    in the waters of Dambovita river. Also, the Rroma were the kings of the street
    performances of that time. Their bears were hopping about, while their fiddlers’
    music made the delight of the pubgoers. I also did some research on the Turkish
    community, but they were in small numbers at that time, since the privileges
    granted to Wallachia only allowed for the ruler’s Turkish secretary and his team
    to be present in the country. He was known as Divan efendi. However, there
    was a princely brass band made of Turkish musicians, an Ottoman police force,
    the one of the Beshlii, the mounted Turkish cavalry, there were also a couple of
    merchants. People of the Balkans were much more numerous, the Christian ones, first
    of all, since for them Bucharest was like a true Eldorado. Gaining access to
    the Romanian space was, that was very difficult, some sort of special paper or
    visa, known as tescherea, was needed, which granted safe passage to the
    promised land. They were labelled Serbs
    in a broader sense, but there were also Albanians among them. The Serbs, that
    is the peoples south of the Danube, of Slavic origin, were mainly known as
    vegetable farmers and tanners. On Lipscani and Gabroveni, two of the streets
    in today’s historical center, many Bulgarians sold their merchandise, for
    instance.


    We
    know that the Saxons, a Germanic population, settled in Transylvania 800 years
    ago. Yet it was also in the Phanariot age that other German groups settled in
    Bucharest. They brought the technical and engineering spirit with them. In time,
    the French who would come over also arrived in large numbers. They were brought
    by the boyars as private tutors for their children.




  • The Iconography of the Phanariot Period

    The Iconography of the Phanariot Period

    The princes of Moldavia after 1711 and those of Wallachia after 1716 came from rich families residing in the Fener area of Istanbul, hence the name Phanariot. The Phanariot period was considered by some history currents, such as the Romantic one, one of the most nefarious in Romania’s history. It was seen as deeply corrupt, marked by get-rich-quick mentalities and impoverishment of the populace.




    Culturally, the Phanariot period was a period when Greek culture was dominant, as reflected by the iconography, especially in the early 19th century. The Phanariot period ended violently in the 1821 revolution led by Tudor Vladimirescu, when Romanian families started placing their scions on the throne once again.




    Some Phanariot families became gradually Romanian, adopting a nationalist and modernizing discourse. Berated by Romantics and used as a scapegoat for every social and economic ill, the Phanariot period dominated Romanian history until the union of 1859 between Moldavia and Wallachia. Historian Adrian-Silvan Ionescu studied the fashion and mentalities of the first half of the 19th century, a century marked by Phanariot Levantine mentalities. He pointed out for us the opulence of that era in its imagery.




    Adrian-Silvan Ionescu: “The Phanariot world is represented by the most beautiful nuance you can find on a painter’s palette. The Phanariot period was the period of sublime picturesque, both in words and in attitudes. When the nobles spoke to each other, they used a Greek term of endearment. They had an exceedingly flowery speech, as reflected in archive material. They dressed in garb typical of Constantinople, with the refinement and wealth of the old Byzantium. They continued Byzantium where they lived, as Nicolae Iorga said in his theory called Byzance après Byzance, very well supported.”




    The rich clothing was typical of this culture. They dazzled Western elites, according to Adrian-Silvan Ionescu:


    Adrian-Silvan Ionescu: “The princely courts in Iasi and Bucharest were so glamorous, with their opulent clothing, that representatives of royal houses and imperial houses of Europe were amazed. One of the most important Romanian noblemen, Ienachita Vacarescu, went to the Imperial Court in Vienna to try and persuade the emperor to send the two Austrian princes home. They had adopted the so-called German garb, and had shaved off their beards. The countesses and baronesses of the Imperial Court actually took off some of his clothes, in admiration for their quality, mostly the Cashmere shawl he used as a girdle.”



    The paintings depicting Romanian nobility in the early 19th century showed off expensive clothing, jewelry, weapons and fancy cuts. Here is Adrian-Silvan Ionescu once again.



    Adrian-Silvan Ionescu: “We can see expensive furs, such as sable and ermine, expensive and heavy silks, jewelry, fancy weaponry, with silver and gems. They were the measure of the fabulous wealth boasted by these princes, who knew how to get rich in record time, but also a measure of their elevated tastes. An analysis of the clothing of that time, in terms of shape and color, shows the impeccable taste of their wearer. The matching of colors and textures, the way they were worn, with dignity and pride, showed off their status and importance. We know that there were 3 nobleman ranks. The first were the court noblemen, followed by the second and third ranking. Each had certain fabrics and furs they wore. No one could exceed his station and wear sable, if they were not court nobles. The most important sign of rank was the beard, which was worn only by the court noblemen, while the second and third ranks had a mustache. When a nobleman was elevated to the first ranking, the prince’s personal barber shaped his beard.”



    Phanariot fashion is a lasting legacy in Romanian culture, but only as a passing trend.


    Adrian-Silvan Ionescu: “Phanariot fashion held sway in the first three decades of the 19th century, even though Phanariot noblemen started disappearing after Tudor Vladimirescu’s revolution, alongside their ruling princes. There was a bit of a revival around the middle of the 19th century, between 1860-1865, when there was a revival of the cerchen, a beautiful vest with very wide, split sleeves, used as daytime couture. At costume balls, many who had grown up in the Phanariot tradition wore it for old times’ sake.”



    The iconography of the Phanariot period displays a long gone world of opulence and wealth, but only of the elites that were grabbing on to their quickly fading status under changing times.