Tag: preservation

  • Inter-war botanist Alexandru Borza

    Inter-war botanist Alexandru Borza

    Nature has been viewed, in the past
    two and a half centuries, as the cradle of humankind, of the individual human
    being, of their families and of the nation. Nature has become a cult of the modern
    man; therefore, plants, animals, air, water or stones have also become an
    object of study for naturalists. In
    Romania, priest Alexandru Borza was one of the most important botanists. He was
    born in the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1887 and died in Romania in 1971, at the
    age of 84.


    Borza’s educational background was a little bit unusual
    for a scientist. Borza graduated from a Catholic theological seminary, then he
    pursued a university program
    with the Faculty of Sciences in Budapest. At the age of 26, Borza earned his
    doctoral degree in natural sciences, in 1913. Until 1918, when the Romanian-inhabited
    territories that had been part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire were included in then
    the Kingdom of Romania, Borza was a teacher of natural sciences with the boys’ high-school in Blaj. After 1918, Borza’s career became increasingly
    effervescent. Among other things, Borza was a rector of the University of Cluj,
    a director of the Cluj Botanical gardens and a scientific director of the Nature
    Monuments Commission. Alexandru Borza discovered more than 80 species of plants,
    while other 20 were named in his honor. Alexandru Borza published around
    500 texts and an ethnobotanic dictionary of Romania, with 11 common names for 2,
    095 species of plants and also supervised the issuing of nine scientific periodicals.
    Alexandru Borza was involved in strong awareness-raising campaigns regarding
    the importance of nature in people’s lives through the articles he contributed
    to the printed press, through pamphlets, public or radio-broadcast conferences.
    Borza also made a leap forward, from the research of nature to the anthropological-folkloric
    and eugenic research.


    The fact that the Romanian
    specialists participated in the Fourth Botany Congress in New York, in 1926,
    gave them an impetus in their involvement in the defense of the environment. Here
    is the historian Cosmin Koszor-Codrea explaining how the American model also
    inspired the Romanians in their subsequent undertakings:

    In 1926, the 4th International Botanical Congress
    was held in New York, which gathered botanists from around the world. Borza was
    also present and delivered a paper on insular flowers in the ecology section. Beside
    the daily presentation sessions, the daily agenda included visits to the botanical
    garden, excursions to the natural division of the Yellowstone natural park,
    Niagara Falls and Rocky Mountains. After he returned to Romania he planned,
    together with the zoologist Popovici-Dimbosanu the first Romanian National
    Congress of Naturists, to be held in Cluj, in 1928. Here they gathered, on the
    same agenda, secondary school teachers, representatives of Hungarian, Romanian,
    and German alpine associations, officials and living scientists of the period.
    Amongst their aims there were many resolutions, the participants pushed forward
    on the political agenda the reorganization of the natural history teaching
    program in secondary schools, the recognition of the fact that the Danube Delta
    is an ecological region, a region rich in bird species, and that the Retezat
    Mountains should become a national park.


    The following steps were the logical consequences of
    the assumed objectives. With details on that, here is Cosmin Koszor-Codrea once again:


    The Ministry of Agriculture and Domains, based on
    their proposals, enacted in 1930 the Law of the protection of natural monuments.
    The following year, the Royal Decree officially recognized the existence of the
    Commission of Natural Monuments. In doing so, the law written by the commission
    defined the following, QUOTE, the monuments of nature are those lands which,
    due to the inhabitancy of animals and plants, have a special scientific and aesthetical
    importance, as well as those which, through their natural beauty, scientific
    interest, are meaning to be conserved and passed over to posterity. Within the
    protection law fall also animals and plant species, as well as rocks, minerals
    and fossils, UNQUOTE.


    The history of the Retezat Nature Park,
    founded in 1935, is proudly linked to the name of Alexandru Borza. There the preservation
    of nature was taken to its highest, thanks to the involvement of the state and
    the regulations that were put in place. In 1939, in The Carpathians magazine,
    Borza published a list of 17 protected plant species. Among them, the
    rhododendron, the Edelweiss and the white Egyptian lotus. Cosmin Koszor-Codrea told
    us the ecologists focused on the Retezat
    Massif the right from the
    start.


    The first region that matched this definition was the Retezat
    Mountains, due to its unique geological formation, its fauna and flora, as well
    as the answer it gave to the Romanian national identity. In the words of Borza,
    QUOTE, The Retezat is, from all points of view, a holy land for science, is a sacred
    monument of nature that has no comparison to other massifs in Romania. That is
    why all our naturalists are considering it predestined by nature to become our
    natural park, the Yellowstone of Romania. Here the young will carry the patriotic
    education, they will feel in these mountains the air of freedom, that as
    inherited by the Dacian king Decebalus, while it will feed their hearts with
    pride by knowing this piece of land as something unique, in its own way, as a
    symbol of our natural health, UNQUOTE.


    Alexandru Borza was one of the most
    prominent names of environment protection in inter-war Romania. Borza was also
    one of the scientists who supported the necessity of Romanians’ being taught
    basic natural history notions as part of the Romanian nation’s specific characteristics.



  • Large-scale construction works and their impact on Romania’s still unspoiled traditional culture

    Large-scale construction works and their impact on Romania’s still unspoiled traditional culture

    A lot has been built in Romania in the more than 30
    years that have passed since the outbreak of the anti-communist Revolution. However,
    and more often than not, construction works were carried chaotically, at once being
    blatantly misplaced, as tall apartment blocks were built in private residence
    districts, new constructions cropped up nearby listed, historical buildings, or
    shapes and colours, randomly chosen, simply took hold of the architecture of an
    area. The disorder caused by all that is simply exhausting. Whether we speak
    about the urban areas or the rural regions, the architectural chaos has mainly been
    generated by the lack of a clear-cut system of standards in the construction
    sector. Not to mentioned the fact that the authorities in right turned a blind
    eye on the serious abnormalities perpetrated on the ground.


    That being said, we invite you to meet the initiators of
    the project themed Upstream Topolog river, Cristina and Paul Budan. For one
    year running, the project’s stated aim was to undertake a study period, prior
    to preservation, of the vernacular architecture of the southern part of Arges
    County’s Topolog river’s upstream segment.


    Why? Because a highway is soon to cross the region. Notwithstanding,
    the Budan family would like that, at least for that particular segment, the good
    points of the technical progress should not have a negative impact on the
    specificity of the area. And, if that may not also be possible, at least the locals’
    centuries-old way of life should be registered for posterity.


    Cristina Budan is a teaching assistant with the
    Faculty of Architecture as part of the Bucharest-based Ion Mincu University.
    She has been explaining what the Upstream Topolog River project actually meant:


    ʺThe project sought to map the entire upper
    part of the Topolog river valley, in a bid to see what could be preserved of
    that traditional architecture and attempt to carry a documentation of the valley,
    to keep as much info as possible on that particular type of architecture, given
    that a highway segment will cross the area. The Cornetu-Tigveni segment will
    cut through the valley, and everything will change, most likely, as soon as
    that happens. As we speak, the valley is rather quiet, as there is no major roadway
    to cross it so it has been preserved in a very good condition, traditional architecture
    was easy to preserve in the area as well. Infrastructure changes will surely alter
    the structure of the villages, the development of the region, therefore it will
    also have its impact on the built heritage.


    What experiences, what revelations did the volunteers
    have, who worked in large numbers for the mapping of the upper part of Topolog
    River Valley?

    Cristina Budan once again.


    ʺAs I’ve said before, there
    is no major road to cross the valley, to cut it through, so it has its own
    peace and quiet, it does have its autonomy. What’s most interesting is that it functions
    as a whole, it is closely-knit and living in that valley is something beautiful,
    it is intertwined, since the locals there are owners of the house, the pasture,
    the meadow land and through their daily activities, they somehow keep the place
    together. That’s what we first liked very much about it! Then there are lots of
    hypostases of the valley. The roads are spectacular, especially when you start losing
    yourself in the lateral hills, the experience is very beautiful, that of
    crossing the valley and how you get to reach those houses. And we found very
    beautiful houses, they were hard to include into categories, we even had our difficulties
    trying to trace several clear-cut typologies, since they are so varied in terms
    of expression, so that was really difficult. We ran into very beautiful, porch houses,
    of that classic typology we all associate with traditional architecture, but we
    also ran into walled houses with very elaborate plastering, with very refined, complex
    roofs…well, it’s all about a very rich expression we don’t seem to pay heed to,
    unfortunately. It is very important for us to keep a database of all we have
    now and the way the valley functions, together with those houses, which are
    expressions of the place, after all. And we were also interested in creating a
    database with the various expressions of those houses, what shapes those houses
    can take, so that we can see howe much variety is, in fact, in the local
    architecture.


    For Paul
    Budan, The Upstream Topolog river project has, apart from its practical importance, a psychological importance as well. A Bucharest city-dweller as he may be,
    Paul Budan has its family roots in that valley. He spends his summers there, actually, and it is not at all indifferent to
    him how the area will look like, after the highway will have been built.


    ʺIt is hard to imagine such a
    transformation. In a couple of years’ time the valley will most likely be a huge
    construction site, but, when the highway is completed, and if possible, with
    the help of the authorities, it will develop harmoniously, we hope, ideally
    speaking, also taking into account the specialists’ opinion…maybe the reconditioning
    of the river banks, maybe the reconstruction of certain pathways, of certain little
    bridges, maybe the proposal of several local constructions, that also including
    buildings which can be put to good use for the highway – parking areas, hotels,
    guesthouses – which somehow can preserve the architectural specificity, at once
    preserving a coherence of the valley. With the help pf the project, we believe
    we could open a dialogue or we can bring together the local authorities and the
    high-level ones, so that a dialogue proper can be initiated to that end, and
    together, they can build the valley harmoniously, naturally. We hope we could
    influence that valley for the better or have a beneficial intervention in that
    process of change.


    That outcome would be an ideal one, by all means. But
    if that may not be the case, unfortunately, the outcome of Cristina and Paul
    Budan’s initiative will be an exceptional work, where joining the two were also
    in the Architects’ Order in Romania, the Village Museum in Bucharest, the Vine
    and Tree Growing Museum in Golesti, Arges County, but also specialists in
    history, sociology, geography, landscaping or volunteer workers, mostly
    student-architects, but also architects who are on the job already. The results
    of their works can be visited at petopologinsus.ro, on the project’s Facebook
    page, but mainly in a book of an exceptional quality, content and design-wise,
    a book which is always impressive in terms of size.


    We’re well aware of the fact that
    modernization is something necessary, we all want that to happen and the infrastructure
    projects are necessary, we all know that. In a separate move, the way things are
    being done matters a lot. First of all, the infrastructure project needs to be implemented
    there with utmost care so that it should not dent the future development of the
    region. What we do hope for, though, is for the project to come up with that promised
    well-being and not take more than it could offer, from that particular place..
    These were the final words of Cristina Brudan, a teaching assistant with the Faculty
    of Architecture in Bucharest. We all want progress, but that should not happen
    at all costs.


    (EN)

  • Environmentally-friendly businesses in Romania

    Environmentally-friendly businesses in Romania

    75% of the respondents in the same
    2019 survey showed their interest in environmentally focused campaigns on waste
    management while 86% were concerned about deforestation. People’s involvement
    in environmentally focused campaigns is lower though, 38% of the Romanians
    would participate in waste management activities while only 33% would get
    involved in reforestation campaigns.








    There are more and more
    initiatives, either individual or belonging to smaller groups, of involvement
    in curbing pollution and other environmentally friendly activities. A case in
    point is Dinu Drog, a lawyer from Bucharest, who founded a civic engagement
    group involved in solving some of the issues currently facing the district he lives
    in.








    Mr. Drog has recently become an
    entrepreneur in the field of renewable energy. Late last year, upon the
    initiative of one of his neighbours, he set up a renewable energy cooperative
    together with a Dutch partner. The cooperative, which initially had 15 members
    now, two months after its launch, boasts a total number of 140. But what
    exactly is a renewable energy cooperative? Here is Dinu Drog at the microphone.






    Dinu Drog: A renewable
    energy cooperative is actually an energy community, a business vehicle, which
    provides renewable energy to the members of this network. At the same time it
    produces energy in keeping with the EU legislation. Energy democracy is a trend
    in Europe nowadays with a view to involving its citizens in this process of
    producing energy by means of solar panels. We, the members of this cooperative,
    are presently holding talks for the purchase of an entire solar field. For the
    time being the cooperative is functioning as an investment fund and its members
    are making interest in exchange for their contributions.






    Members of the aforementioned
    energy cooperative are also shareholders; they benefit from the energy they
    produce but they are going to turn into suppliers as soon as they have obtained
    a production license. Sometimes these cooperatives are allowed to invest in
    renewable energy facilities. Although unique in Romania and Eastern Europe at
    this time, Mr. Drog’s cooperative is an example of civic engagement proving the
    increasing concern some citizens have for the world they live in and the air
    they are breathing. Here is Dinu Drog at the microphone again.








    Dinu Drog: Individual
    solutions are easy to find, if people want to. They can start by sorting waste,
    recycling, monitoring electricity consumption…But we also need public instruments,
    communities, whose contribution to this initiative is even greater because it
    brings people with the same degree of interest in sustainability and
    environmentally -friendly activities together.






    Another example of
    environmentally-friendly entrepreneurship is the Seneca publishing house, which
    describes itself as Romania’s first green publishing house. The enterprise also
    includes a bookshop and a cafeteria showcasing books on environment and where
    visitors pay for the time spent rather than for the drinks, which they prepare
    themselves out of natural ingredients. Here is director Stefania Oprina with
    more on how a green publishing house is actually working.






    Stefania Oprina: When you
    make a product, you need to take into consideration the environment. We produce
    books, and that means we need to use recycled paper and we also recycle the
    waste resulting from the production process. We use this paper to print
    leaflets or other materials in order to avoid using fresh paper. The type of
    ink that we use is also a special one, and all these efforts eventually pay off
    as the final result is very beautiful books, always well-received by readers
    who know that less trees had been cut for their production.








    The growing interest of the
    Romanians in environment preservation has been proven by the fact that ‘The
    Almost Zero Waste Family’, a book written by Jeremie Pichon and Benedicte Moret
    was a best-seller at the Gaudeamus Book Fair last year. Here is Stefania Oprina
    again.








    Stefania Oprina: People are
    already looking for practical solutions to apply. They carry reusable textile
    bags to avoid using plastics and are no longer using plastic forks and knives
    for the same reason. Some are interested in recipes of less polluting
    detergents in a bid to save money and time both in supermarkets and at home
    because these recipes allow them to produce the quantity of detergent they
    need.








    All these initiatives, ranging from
    investment in renewable energy to avoiding the use of plastics or polluting washing
    powders are indicative of the Romanians’ growing interest in a cleaner and
    healthier environment.






    (translated by bill)