Tag: reforms

  • Mental health legislation and reforms in the Romanian space

    Mental health legislation and reforms in the Romanian space

    Mental illnesses have always been a source of pain for patients and their relatives, and in some situations even the cause of many tragedies, such as homicides committed by those who suffered from a mental illness. In time, societies and legislators have taken measures to prevent and punish such acts, codified according to the level of understanding of each and every historical time. In the Romanian space as well, cases of insanity, as they were generically called, were treated, and the crimes committed by those ill-fated people were punished. Codes of laws explicitly stated the measures that the justice representatives had to take to prevent the causes and remove the effects.



    Throughout its history, jurisprudence has moved in the direction of decriminalizing offenders with a mental illness. In the Romanian Principalities, the first codes of laws in this sense were the ‘Romanian Book of Learning or ‘The Code of Vasile Lupu, in Moldavia in 1646 and ‘Making the law right with the help of God or ‘The Code of Matei Basarab, in Wallachia in 1652.



    Psychiatrist Octavian Buda, professor of the history of medicine at the Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Bucharest, summed up their content from the point of view of humanizing the treatment of criminals with a mental illness. I cannot say that they are either constitutional laws or criminal codes, they are very similar to some codes that regulate various activities, including those of a legal nature. What I find remarkable is that these books theorize the fact that the presence of a mental illness means that a criminal can only be punished after an evaluation of those symptoms. And the sentences that refer to this aspect are the paragraphs that are called ‘glave translated as headings. One of these headings goes as follows: ‘when one is unaware of ones madness and out of ones mind, and consequently the father kills the son, one shall not be scolded because there is no bigger punishment than being mad and out of ones mind. It is a conceptualization of a medical aspect that is the subject of a medical safety measure.



    The 18th century was a century of modern reforms in the West. The Romanian Principalities were under the Phanariot rule, and the wave of reforms also reached the principalities: There were Phanariot leaders that put together specific legislation. Alexandru Ipsilanti made a ‘Pravilnicească Condică – Code of Rules in 1780. At the beginning of the 19th century, Callimachi and Caragea had already issued their codes of 1817. The Phanariotes had a practice of bringing doctors from abroad to get involved in medical activities. Those were the dawns of Romanian modernity, with the first period 1800-1850 still being a period with challenges from the point of view of knowledge.



    Modernization was advancing by leaps and bounds, and the Organic Law of the early 1830s continued what had been previously begun: The Organic Law did at least two things. First of all, it created an entity called the Doctors Commission, which later became the College of Physicians, and organized those aspects related to the standardization of medical practice. A kind of unrestricted practice license was created. In the sense that not any doctor was allowed to mess around, to come with a couple of tins and bones and produce a holistic treatment. There were expatriate doctors of Italian and Greek origin who had also traveled a lot during the Phanariot era. And the main idea was for this ‘imported elite to be able to communicate at least acceptably with a rural population that was rather reticent about these professional categories that they did not understand.



    After laws and regulations, treatment facilities also appeared. One of the first such facilities or institutions was the Mărcuța mental institution.



    Octavian Buda is back at the microphone with details: In 1838, during the time of Alexandru Ghica, something interesting from an institutional point of view happened. The Mărcuța facility appeared under the following circumstances: a part of the monastery came out of the church jurisdiction and became part of the then Home Affairs Ministry or the Interior Ministry. That’s where they started treating the psychiatric patients, in the modern sense that we still have today. The first doctor at Mărcuța institution was Dr. Minis, of Greek origin, who had studied in Leipzig. He was followed by Nicolae Gănescu who had studied in Kharkiv. He reorganized the psychiatric activity in the modern sense, as it was around the year 1850. He was concerned not so much with occupational therapy as with humane treatments because physical restraint methods such as tying were used at the time. He used woolen straps that did not hurt the patient. He also brought an electromagnetic device, but we don’t know what he did with it. Then followed the era of Alexandru Suțu, from the Phanariot family, who had studied in Athens and Paris. He took over the management of the Mărcuța hospital and remained at the helm of the institution for many years. He is the doctor who published in 1877 the book called ‘The Alienated before medicine and society, which is practically the first treatise on social and judicial psychiatry.



    After Romania became an independent state in 1878, it developed appropriate health and legal policies. And psychiatry will be an expanding medical specialty. (LS)

  • The Week in Review 26.06 – 02.07.2023

    The Week in Review 26.06 – 02.07.2023

    Laws on sensitive topics adopted by Parliament



    The Romanian Parliament dedicated this past week of the ordinary session to some bills related, in one form or another, to pensions. On Monday, senators and deputies eliminated the special pensions granted to MPs, thus renouncing a privilege considered immoral by the press and public opinion. Two other sensitive laws were passed on Wednesday. One puts a ban on cumulating pensions with salaries in the public system but exempts from this ban exactly the local elected officials and parliamentarians, which makes the bill controversial. Other professional categories exempted from the rule are the teaching staff and the specialized medical staff, foster carers, as well as employees of the Romanian Academy, the National Bank of Romania and some national agencies. The law that aims to reform the special pensions, which are only partially based on the contribution from the active period and which benefit magistrates, the military, diplomats, parliamentary staff, the Court of Accounts staff or the aeronautics staff, also received a favorable final vote. However, the bill underwent major changes. Actually, the application of the reform was postponed by five years, so that, until 2028, prosecutors, judges and the military can retire under the same conditions as before. The retirement age will increase in stages, and magistrates will be required, in order to retire, to have at least 25 years of experience in the specialty. Pensions that exceed the average net income will be taxed by 15%. The opposition Save Romania Union – USR, which favors the total elimination of special pensions, voted against the bill, claiming that, after its adoption, there will be 210,000 special pensioners in Romania as before. The High Court of Cassation and Justice contested the constitutionality of the law on special pensions and the one on cumulating pensions and salaries in the public system. The reform of the special pensions is a milestone in the National Recovery and Resilience Plan.



    The National Recovery and Resilience Plan – PNRR, positive assessment



    With 49 milestones and targets met, out of a total of 51, Romania successfully passed the European Commission’s test regarding the second payment request submitted under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, worth 3.22 billion Euros. The two milestones that were not met are related to energy investments, and because of failing to meet these two targets, Bucharest will lose approximately 53 million Euros. However, nothing is irreparable, because Romania still has 6 months to prove that the two pending milestones have been met. Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu says that the Commission’s positive assessment encourages the government to work to meet the targets, and he promises that the two delayed milestones in the energy field will be quickly recovered. Romania benefits from an allocation of over 29 billion Euros for the implementation of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan and has already collected two pre-financing installments with a cumulative value of approximately 3.8 billion Euros.



    New European aid for farmers



    Romania will receive 30 million Euros from the European Commission as support for farmers affected by massive imports of cheap grains from Ukraine. It is the second aid package, and the money comes from the Union Reserve Fund. Of the five EU member states that have a border with Ukraine or are in its vicinity, Poland and Romania benefited from the largest aid packages: Poland, almost 40 million Euros and Romania 30 million Euros. Cumulatively, packages one and two bring Romanian farmers a support of 40 million Euros, and the Romanian Government has the Commission’s agreement to double it.



    Preparations ahead of the NATO summit in Vilnius



    Leaders of NATO member states and the NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg convened in the Hague for a meeting focusing on the preparation of the upcoming allied Summit, to be held in Vilnius in mid-July. Romanias president Klaus Iohannis also participated in the event. In the Netherlands, Iohannis reiterated that Russia is and will still be the immediate and the most direct threat to Euro-Atlantic security. Consequently, he insisted that the allies will have to be capable and ready to strengthen their position even further and continue to give the required support to Ukraine and to the most vulnerable partners, the Republic of Moldova, in particular. Given its strategic position, Romania is especially interested in further strengthening the Alliances Eastern Flank, through a coherent and unitary approach, Klaus Iohannis also stated. This means, according to him, providing the required forces, structures, capabilities and equipment, as well as the appropriate command and control arrangements. As regards Ukraine, if, in Bucharest, in 2008, the Allies decided that it should become a NATO member state, in Vilnius that commitment will have to be carried further, Klaus Iohannis said.



    Culture and sport


    The headline-grabbing event of the week is the International Theatre Festival in Sibiu, which has now reached its 30th edition. Throughout the festival, the central Transylvanian town, still bearing the hallmark if its Saxon heritage, is literally sizzling. Thanks to the Radu Stanca theatre halls, the unconventional spaces, the churches, squares and medieval streets, Sibiu has yet again been the generous host of performing arts. Thousands of artists and hundreds of events literally galvanized the festival, held under the sign of the ‘Miracle, the theme picked for the recently-held edition.


    In sport, the headline-grabbing event this week has been the hearing of the Romanian tennis player Simona Halep by the court judging the doping charges pressed against Halep in October 2022. The past months have been long and costly for the career of the athlete who will be 32 in September. Halep no longer has a place among the worlds top 50 tennis players since she could no longer take part in tournaments. Halep, the former WTA number 1 and two-time winner of a Grand Slam tournament, will receive a final court ruling in July. (LS, EN)

  • Healthcare in Romania

    Healthcare in Romania

    Viewed by many experts as a terminally ill patient, the Romanian healthcare system is a constant source of frustration and disappointment. Patients criticise the poor state of hospitals, the shortage of medicine, and the fact that medical services are conditional on bribes, which are often higher than the amounts paid as contributions to the public health insurance fund. In turn, doctors complain about the underfunding of the system, reflected in the lack of modern equipment, in inadequate staffing levels and the small salaries.



    A firm advocate of his profession, the former president of the Romanian College of Physicians, Vasile Astarastoaie, who in the meantime was sentenced in a corruption investigation, said the minimum income of a doctor in Romania is around 400 euros, whereas in Denmark, for instance, it is over 8,000. He argued that it is precisely because of the low salaries that more than 20,000 doctors have left the country in the past few years. Himself a physician, the current Health Minister Nicolae Banicioiu, a Social Democrat, has proposed a set of measures to ensure the required number of specialists in hospital wards, in spite of the migration of medical personnel. On Monday, he asked for Parliaments support for a bill drawn up by the Government in this respect. Nicolae Baniciou:



    We are talking about an increase in physicians income. Indeed, it is a rethinking of the system, by means of certain facilities, which basically ensure supplemental remuneration for the work provided in public hospitals and for private patients.



    According to the Minister, 100% bonuses will be paid for weekend shifts and working on legal holidays. To ensure round-the-clock healthcare services, he also suggests the system should also include third-year resident doctors, under the supervision of a specialist doctor. The Liberals, in Opposition, do not believe this project is practical. Here is the Liberal Deputy Horia Cristian:



    I believe this is unacceptable, because the training system is deficient, to use a euphemism. In short, I believe this is a complex problem and it requires vision, it requires large-scale discussion which should include complex measures.



    The public largely shares the scepticism of the Opposition, particularly after the chaos generated early this month by the introduction of the compulsory health cards. Any visit to the family physician, hospital or pharmacy can only be refunded based on this card. People who are not covered by public insurance benefit from a minimal package of services, and emergency services do not require the use of health cards. But when the law came into force, hundreds of thousands of insured patients had not received their cards, and the IT system crashed in the first days of operation.