Tag: Romanian Youth Council

  • Youth, Employment and Mobility

    Youth, Employment and Mobility


    According to a survey conducted by the National Statistics Institute in the second quarter of the year 2016, there were some 4.8 million young people living in Romania, aged 15 to 34. Half of them were employed at the time of the survey, which doesnt necessarily mean that they had a stable job. It means that they had worked at least one hour per week and were paid for that. Some three quarters of them were full-time salaried employees, mainly in services (50%), industry and construction (28%) and agriculture (21%). Vladimir Alexandrescu, a spokesperson for the National Statistics Institute, told us that the situation of those who work in agriculture is not very bright.



    Vladimir Alexandrescu: “Working in agriculture means, most of the time, working in subsistence households. Of course, agriculture and rural life does have a modern part too, but, generally speaking, this too is organized as a family structure, which means that they produce only to cover the basic consumption needs of a small, family-type group. Statistically, these people too are classified as employed. But if we look at the deeper reality, their social and economic contribution is lower than what they could have accomplished had they had the possibility to work in more developed agricultural enterprises, like the farms in Western Europe or the US.”



    Also, at the time of the survey, more than 2.3 million young people were inactive, and 270,000 were unemployed, meaning that they were trying to find a job or used to be part of Romanias work force at one point. The others were still in school. Besides them, some one million young people, accounting for 19.9% of the population targeted by the survey, and 28% of those who had completed a form of education, were neither working, nor enrolled in the formal education system. According to Mihai Dragos, president of the Youth Council in Romania, these figures reflect a real tragedy.



    Mihai Dragos: “Other studies show that, if young people stay inactive for more than 4 months, consequences could be serious, in the sense that they will have less stable jobs, employment will alternate with unemployment, they will find it more difficult to advance in their careers and will accept smaller salaries”.



    One of the main causes of school dropout is poverty, and 53% of school children do not go past secondary education. Two out of five Romanian young people believe that high school is enough in terms of education, even though higher education graduates have a much easier time finding a job. 49.3% of the young people who had a job at the time of the survey had got it by applying directly to companies or institutions, while 28.8% found their jobs through relatives or friends.



    Mihai Dragos: “As regards employment, it is interesting that around 30% of them get a job through relatives or friends. In the western countries, this networking is important too. Having a network of acquaintances, knowing people, having connections, employers included, can be useful.”



    On the other hand, those who manage to get employed or get a form of paid work, are not very willing to travel long distances in order to improve their situation. Only 3.8% of the young people who were working, aged 25 to 29, had decided to change their place of residence in order to get that job. At the same time, only 20% of the unemployed youth said they were willing to move to find a better job.



    Vladimir Alexandrescu: “Mobility has a double meaning, we are talking about the mobility of the already employed, as well as the mobility of the job seekers who could get a job in places other than the one they live in. At the same time, the fact that so many young people go abroad, far away from their country, seems to contradict this. The most active and highly-skilled young people dont seem to mind working anywhere. They are willing to take a job thousands of kilometers away from home.”



    But how would a youth representative explain this situation? Here is Mihai Dragos once more:


    “Young people are rather reluctant to move away from home to work. But this has something to do with the states housing policies too. Does the state help young people find a place they can afford? And here Im referring to the minimum wage too. It is difficult for someone working for the minimum wage to pay 150 to 200 Euro a month for rent, in a city where they have to get by with a salary of approximately 330 Euro. Its simply unaffordable to move if you have such a low income.”



    This is the reason why youth organization representatives believe that the youth situation should be addressed by public policies, starting with a better correlation between the education system and the labor market, in addition to incentives for increased mobility, as well as paid internships in public and private organizations.




  • Higher Education in Romania

    Higher Education in Romania

    As communist society promoted the
    proletariat at an ideological level, higher education studies were not
    encouraged at all. College seats were just a few, exams were difficult and the
    competition very high. It’s no wonder that in the early 1990s, Romania was
    facing a shortage of university graduates. In 1992, only 5.8% of the population
    graduated from a university. Since then, however, many private universities
    have emerged and state universities have increased the number of available
    seats, and therefore the situation has
    improved significantly, but not enough as compared to the other European
    countries. The percentage of university graduates in Romania is the lowest in the EU,
    even of those in the 30-34 age bracket: 25.6% of the population of that age
    graduated from a higher education institution, while the European average is
    39.1%. Looking for causes, the poor economic situation of the majority
    population and certain characteristics of the education system in Romania
    always come up, as Mihai Dragos, president of the Youth Council in Romania told
    us:


    Mihai Dragos:
    We must see what happens in the pre-university environment. Only 48% of the
    students manage to pass the baccalaureate exam. Also, we must take into account
    the school dropout rate, which has increased in the past years, reaching 18%
    today. Also, there are studies conducted by various student organizations that
    indicate a high rate of school dropping in the university education system,
    especially at bachelor level. Some 35-40% of the young people who enroll into a
    university do not manage to graduate. Many times they get to study a field that
    does not suit them and their realize
    that’s not what they want to study and decide to either change the faculty or
    get a job and therefore they no longer have time to study. It also happens that
    some students can no longer afford to attend a higher education institution.


    VF Unavoidably, furthering one’s education is
    very much influenced by financial and economic factors. Some families simply
    cannot cover such expenses. On the other hand, there are many people who belive
    that there is no point in attending a
    higher education institution, as this doesn’t really help people become successful
    in life. It’s a wrong perception, though, because studies have shown that most
    of the unemployed are people with no higher education, as Victoria Stoiciu from
    the Friedrich Ebert foundation said:


    Victoria Stoiciu: The question is whether higher
    education pays off. It is a costly investment for many people. Many people are
    not born and bred in cities that are university centers. Apart from tuition
    fees, education entails a series of other expenses, such as those for living
    and transport, which very few people can afford. The question then arises as to
    the cost-efficiency ratio: is it efficient for me to invest in my own education
    for four years, get a diploma that can only get me a poorly paid job, as
    beginners’ jobs are generally poorly paid in Romania, or to leave for Italy or
    Spain where with no diploma at all I can get a minimum salary of 800-900
    Euros? For many Romanians, the answer to that conundrum is : no, investing in
    education does not pay off, in the long run.


    Reality runs counter to the
    aforementioned perceptions, which ought to be amended by the education system
    and the family, Mihai Dragos believes.


    Children and teenagers do not get
    any help in understanding the dynamics of society. Specifically, European
    statistics show that the demand for unskilled labour is on the wane across the
    EU. Yet the demand for prospective
    employees who have graduated from higher education institutions is on
    the rise. One of the major global trends is automation, and many factories
    already used fully automated equipment for their operations. Certain jobs will
    disappear and the demand for certain skills will decrease. The labor market
    will be searching for people with a higher education degree. That is also part
    of Romania’s long-term strategy as, if the country wants to remain competitive,
    it will have to place itself in line with and prepare to cope with such trends.
    Otherwise, we shall be witnessing a rise in the unemployment rate, which is
    already high among youngsters and we may not be able to deal with that in 20,
    30 years’ time.


    VF Searching for the causes of the
    currently small share of higher education graduates, the Friedrich Ebert Romania Foundation through
    the Social Monitor project also took into account the so-called brain drain.
    Significant as the phenomenon may be, the explanations it provides are only
    partial. Each year, only 10 higher education graduation diplomas per 1000
    people are granted in Romania, for persons aged 15-64, which is half the number
    of similar diplomas granted in Poland and way below the EU average, the Social
    Monitor has revealed.


    Furthermore, knowledge for the sake of knowledge -
    which has always been one of the intrinsic values of higher education – seems
    to have become less attractive, according to Victoria Stoiciu:


    Education is strictly approached in terms of
    efficiency and the capacity to respond to
    the labor market’s needs. Such an approach is not wrong, yet it also provides a
    narrow approach to what education means in a broader sense, to what university
    stands for. The role of education is not to just train the workforce. Education
    does have that role indeed, but that in no way is the only one. Education is
    also supposed to form citizens, to train people so they can develop critical
    thinking, to teach us how to educate ourselves or develop ourselves. That
    idealistic dimension of education is completely neglected today. To a greater
    extent, emphasis is laid on the practical dimension, and this practical
    dimension is simply not up to the mark.


    For this situation
    to change, experts who coordinate the Social Monitor recommend an increase in
    the budget earmarked for education. In the last 10 years, the GDP percentage
    earmarked for education has never gone beyond 5%, the lowest in Europe.