Tag: Social Monitor

  • Religious Opinions and Attitudes

    Religious Opinions and Attitudes

    95% of the Romanians believe in God, but only 21% say they go to church regularly. Also, although 67% are of the opinion that ‘homosexuality should be discouraged, only 27% of the Romanians think that a referendum is necessary to define marriage as strictly the union between and man and a woman. These data are part of a recently published info-graph, aimed to highlight religious attitudes among Romanians.



    The Friedrich Ebert Romania Foundation made public the info-graph as part of its Social Monitor project, at a time when the ruling coalition announced its intention to organize a referendum, in response to a petition signed by three million people, calling for a change in the Romanian Constitution, in the sense that the Constitution should clearly state that family is based only on the freely consented marriage between spouses, man and woman, instead of just between spouses, as the fundamental law currently states. The petition was set forth by ‘The Coalition for Family, which militates for the traditional heterosexual family, based, among other things, on Christian principles.



    Although most Romanians believe themselves to be religious, as both sociological surveys and common perceptions indicate, the Social Monitor info-graph has shown some discrepancies and gaps with regard to the choice of a religious life, which seems to be so solid and consistent. Here is the representative of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation Victoria Stoiciu with more:



    Victoria Stoiciu: “According to the census, 99.6% of the Romanians belong to a certain religious denomination. On the other hand, though, if we look at the way in which people choose to live by these religious beliefs in their day to day lives, only 44% of them pray every day. Only 21% of the respondents say they go to church weekly. So, the discrepancy is clear. Although approximately 100% of the Romanians say they are religious, in reality they do not practice religion as much.



    Anthropologist Vintila Mihailescu agrees with the data made public by the Social Monitor, which in fact confirm several credible researches carried out by prestigious sociological institutions, and the data provided by the national census conducted in 2011. Still, there are nuances to be kept in mind, especially when analysing the gap between what Romanians declare and what they really do. One example is that the vast majority of Romanians say they are religious, but only a quarter go to church every week, and less than a half pray every day.



    Vintila Mihailescu: “This gap should not be interpreted as hypocrisy. We must understand that orthodox practices are, probably, less institutionalized than others. The direct relationship with God, by praying at home, is in itself a form of practicing religion. This gap in the graph is therefore not necessarily hypocrisy, as it is usually believed. It does not mean ‘I say I am religious, but actually I dont have time for this foolishness. Many communities that are very religious have their own customs and habits, which are often pre-Christian, even related to magic. These practices, therefore, which are by no means canonical, are accepted by some priests as a means of shepherding the believers.



    In fact, the info graph made public by the Social Monitor confirms that the religious customs of a community—such as the generic community of Romanians—is not so much an expression of the faith of its members, but rather a bond between them.



    Victoria Stoiciu: “It also seems paradoxical that 99.6% of the respondents say they belong to a religion, but only 95% say they believe in God. While not spectacular, this 5% gap is not insignificant either. It can be explained by the sense of belonging to a cultural community and to a tradition. For instance, if you were born into an Orthodox Christian family, you have been baptized, got married in church and so on, all these things mark your membership of a religion, but they do not mean that you necessarily believe in God as well. Belonging to a cultural community is not to mean that a person feels bound to observe the regular religious practices: going to church, praying, etc. The major rituals, the rites of passage, like baptisms, weddings, funerals, are generally observed.



    It is along the same lines of a gap between principles and practice that another set of data has been read, namely the ones regarding the low support for a referendum on defining a family as based on the marriage of a man and a woman, although 67% of the Romanians believe homosexuality should be discouraged by society. Still, these data are also indicative of tolerance, Vintila Mihailescu believes:



    Vintila Mihailescu: “The fact that homosexuality must be discouraged is, for a believer, a Christian or a man of the church, only natural. This is not good or bad in itself, but rather it is in line with how people define a good Christian. The surprise lies somewhere else. Two-thirds of Romanians seem to say: homosexuality must not be encouraged, but this must not mean persecution, it must not go as far as to changing the Constitution or the laws. Homosexuality should be neither encouraged, nor punished. And this requires more wisdom than I had expected.



    Something even more relevant for the current state of mind in the Romanian society is that 79% of the Romanians link faith to morality, saying that one must believe in God in order to be a moral person.



    Vintila Mihailescu: “This is symptomatic, because in peoples minds this connection is reinforced when living in a society perceived as being immoral, with very lax rules. There is a perceived risk of immorality, so the church becomes the only chance and the only thing to rely on. There is a return to the church, seen as the only possible guarantor of morality. And this means more than the fact that society is closely linked to religion. It shows peoples distrust in the morality of their society. We see ourselves as a deeply immoral society, or as threatened to become so, and in this case the only protection we have left comes from the church.

  • Emigrants from and immigrants to Romania

    Emigrants from and immigrants to Romania


    According to official statistics carried by the press recently, from 2007 to 2017, 3.4 million Romanians left this country, accounting for about 17% of the population. Most of them have left for more than one year in countries which they deem more attractive from an economic point of view. According to Social Monitor, a sociological project of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Romania, in 2017 almost 2.5 million Romanians were living abroad.



    Victoria Stoiciu, programme manager at the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, has more details: ”The statistics refer to the 2003-2017 period. On the one hand, the document points to the number of Romanians who went abroad for more than one year and on the other, to the upward trend of emigration. The figures do not cover seasonal workers, those Romanians working abroad for three, six or eight months a year. They go abroad either to pick strawberries or to work in constructions. If we take them into consideration too, the number of Romanians leaving the country is much higher, standing at over 3 million.”



    This situation makes Romania comparable to one of the countries confronted with a tough and long civil war, namely Syria. Victoria Stoiciu explains: “Romania ranks second in the world after Syria, in terms of the Diaspora growth rate, not as regards the number of migrants or the percentage of the population they represent. The rate at which Romanians left the country ranks us second after Syria. That is disquieting because since 2000, Romania has reported economic growth, though. So, we must analyze the growth model. How is economic growth felt and distributed among the population given that the rate at which Romanians left the country places it second after Syria, a country devastated by civil war?”



    Those who leave the country are mostly people aged between 25 and 38, a category that is very important to Romania’s economy. They account for around 20% of the Romanian migrants. A lot of skilled workers from such areas as constructions or people with high qualification such as physicians or IT experts also leave Romania. Under the circumstances, they leave a void on the labor market, which for the time being, has not been covered yet.



    What about the migrants coming to Romania? According to the General Inspectorate for Immigration, in late 2017, there were around 67,000 foreigners from third countries, including people with international protection, that is refugees. The latter included over 800 people who came to Romania through the EU Refugee Relocation Mechanism. Also last year, there were 4,820 asylum seeking applications, a larger number than the average 1,500 applications in previous years. Who are the people from third countries who settled in Romania or sought asylum and why did they choose Romania? Generally, they are men who once they got the refugee status or international protection in Romania can bring their family over. Moreover, family reunification or reunification with a family member who has already settled here is the reason why many people come from third countries to Romania. However, there is another reason too which such people have invoked of late: the fear of persecution or generalized violence in their native countries.



    Foreigners have also come to Romania to get a job. Luciana Lazarescu, an expert in migration, explains: “There are 5,900 people with a work permit in Romania at present. They are nationals from third countries. In 2017, most of the work permits were given to nationals from Vietnam to work in the naval industry, as well as to nationals from Turkey, China and Serbia. The jobs in greatest demand for which work permits were given are those of welder, locksmith in metallic and naval constructions, restoration carpenter, mainly qualified jobs in the naval industry.”



    Admitting that for many refugees, Romania is not a destination country, an attractive country like West European countries, Luciana Lazarescu refers to a government programme for the insertion of people who have the right to reside in Romania: “There is a government programme for the integration of people with international protection; it includes a package of measures facilitating the foreigners’ integration into society, in the labor market and their adaptation to customs and the institutional system in Romania. The programme includes a Romanian language course and cultural orientation; various NGOs also offer other services targeting those categories of foreigners. A delicate question is the way in which the institutions involved in that programme collaborate and assume that task.”



    Given the small number of foreigners who have the right to settle in Romania and the lack of policies aiming to bring Romanians back home, what can be done to do away with the shortage of labor force?



    Victoria Stoiciu is back at the microphone: “Attracting immigrants is easy to say but hard to do, because Romania is not attractive for them. Since a migrant or refugee gets a EU visa, why should he or she settle in Romania instead of going to work in Germany, France of Belgium where wages are much higher? At the same time, it isn’t easy to make Romanians come back home. Ultimately, it’s all about wages. The state has the minimum wage as an instrument, which is now 2.5 times higher than in 2011, but the private sector should also adapt and increase wages. Sometimes, to do that, companies should reduce their profit and even be wound up. So, the solution isn’t simple at all.”

  • Higher Education in Romania

    Higher Education in Romania

    As communist society promoted the
    proletariat at an ideological level, higher education studies were not
    encouraged at all. College seats were just a few, exams were difficult and the
    competition very high. It’s no wonder that in the early 1990s, Romania was
    facing a shortage of university graduates. In 1992, only 5.8% of the population
    graduated from a university. Since then, however, many private universities
    have emerged and state universities have increased the number of available
    seats, and therefore the situation has
    improved significantly, but not enough as compared to the other European
    countries. The percentage of university graduates in Romania is the lowest in the EU,
    even of those in the 30-34 age bracket: 25.6% of the population of that age
    graduated from a higher education institution, while the European average is
    39.1%. Looking for causes, the poor economic situation of the majority
    population and certain characteristics of the education system in Romania
    always come up, as Mihai Dragos, president of the Youth Council in Romania told
    us:


    Mihai Dragos:
    We must see what happens in the pre-university environment. Only 48% of the
    students manage to pass the baccalaureate exam. Also, we must take into account
    the school dropout rate, which has increased in the past years, reaching 18%
    today. Also, there are studies conducted by various student organizations that
    indicate a high rate of school dropping in the university education system,
    especially at bachelor level. Some 35-40% of the young people who enroll into a
    university do not manage to graduate. Many times they get to study a field that
    does not suit them and their realize
    that’s not what they want to study and decide to either change the faculty or
    get a job and therefore they no longer have time to study. It also happens that
    some students can no longer afford to attend a higher education institution.


    VF Unavoidably, furthering one’s education is
    very much influenced by financial and economic factors. Some families simply
    cannot cover such expenses. On the other hand, there are many people who belive
    that there is no point in attending a
    higher education institution, as this doesn’t really help people become successful
    in life. It’s a wrong perception, though, because studies have shown that most
    of the unemployed are people with no higher education, as Victoria Stoiciu from
    the Friedrich Ebert foundation said:


    Victoria Stoiciu: The question is whether higher
    education pays off. It is a costly investment for many people. Many people are
    not born and bred in cities that are university centers. Apart from tuition
    fees, education entails a series of other expenses, such as those for living
    and transport, which very few people can afford. The question then arises as to
    the cost-efficiency ratio: is it efficient for me to invest in my own education
    for four years, get a diploma that can only get me a poorly paid job, as
    beginners’ jobs are generally poorly paid in Romania, or to leave for Italy or
    Spain where with no diploma at all I can get a minimum salary of 800-900
    Euros? For many Romanians, the answer to that conundrum is : no, investing in
    education does not pay off, in the long run.


    Reality runs counter to the
    aforementioned perceptions, which ought to be amended by the education system
    and the family, Mihai Dragos believes.


    Children and teenagers do not get
    any help in understanding the dynamics of society. Specifically, European
    statistics show that the demand for unskilled labour is on the wane across the
    EU. Yet the demand for prospective
    employees who have graduated from higher education institutions is on
    the rise. One of the major global trends is automation, and many factories
    already used fully automated equipment for their operations. Certain jobs will
    disappear and the demand for certain skills will decrease. The labor market
    will be searching for people with a higher education degree. That is also part
    of Romania’s long-term strategy as, if the country wants to remain competitive,
    it will have to place itself in line with and prepare to cope with such trends.
    Otherwise, we shall be witnessing a rise in the unemployment rate, which is
    already high among youngsters and we may not be able to deal with that in 20,
    30 years’ time.


    VF Searching for the causes of the
    currently small share of higher education graduates, the Friedrich Ebert Romania Foundation through
    the Social Monitor project also took into account the so-called brain drain.
    Significant as the phenomenon may be, the explanations it provides are only
    partial. Each year, only 10 higher education graduation diplomas per 1000
    people are granted in Romania, for persons aged 15-64, which is half the number
    of similar diplomas granted in Poland and way below the EU average, the Social
    Monitor has revealed.


    Furthermore, knowledge for the sake of knowledge -
    which has always been one of the intrinsic values of higher education – seems
    to have become less attractive, according to Victoria Stoiciu:


    Education is strictly approached in terms of
    efficiency and the capacity to respond to
    the labor market’s needs. Such an approach is not wrong, yet it also provides a
    narrow approach to what education means in a broader sense, to what university
    stands for. The role of education is not to just train the workforce. Education
    does have that role indeed, but that in no way is the only one. Education is
    also supposed to form citizens, to train people so they can develop critical
    thinking, to teach us how to educate ourselves or develop ourselves. That
    idealistic dimension of education is completely neglected today. To a greater
    extent, emphasis is laid on the practical dimension, and this practical
    dimension is simply not up to the mark.


    For this situation
    to change, experts who coordinate the Social Monitor recommend an increase in
    the budget earmarked for education. In the last 10 years, the GDP percentage
    earmarked for education has never gone beyond 5%, the lowest in Europe.